I assume this is stock voltage right? I made a Vmod guide for the reference PCB Fury and FuryX: http://cxzoid.blogspot.cz/2015/09/r9-fury-tri-x-and-fury-x-vmod-guide.html . HBM on air doesn't seem to scale but the core clock goes well with voltage. I was able to bench as high as 1180mhz on 1.3V.
Yes it is stock voltage with stock aio.Cards Vid voltage is very low 1.175 on load. 1145mhz core is possible with all 4 cards under non cf. Hbm is over 600mhz on all cards with stock voltage. coreclock and Hbm clock goes down under cf,tri cf,quad cf.
Will mod the cards later when i have time and go subzero waterchiller.
Fury X and unlocked fury strix will likly give Titan x and 980ti special edition cards a match in FsX and Ultra, were drive overhead has less impact(combined score)(cpu score).
Comments
WHOAH, top5!
Very good!
Keep pushing , really good work with the FuryX
nice, 3rd!
I assume this is stock voltage right? I made a Vmod guide for the reference PCB Fury and FuryX: http://cxzoid.blogspot.cz/2015/09/r9-fury-tri-x-and-fury-x-vmod-guide.html . HBM on air doesn't seem to scale but the core clock goes well with voltage. I was able to bench as high as 1180mhz on 1.3V.
Thanks all.
Yes it is stock voltage with stock aio.Cards Vid voltage is very low 1.175 on load. 1145mhz core is possible with all 4 cards under non cf. Hbm is over 600mhz on all cards with stock voltage. coreclock and Hbm clock goes down under cf,tri cf,quad cf.
Will mod the cards later when i have time and go subzero waterchiller.
Fury X and unlocked fury strix will likly give Titan x and 980ti special edition cards a match in FsX and Ultra, were drive overhead has less impact(combined score)(cpu score).
Did you try running asymmetrical clocks? As in each gpu running different core and mem clocks?
Not in this run.
Did you try 15.7? Because in my case 15.7 is much faster than 15.7.1
Log in or register to comment.