Rankings and Points
World Record Rank
Not I.nfraR.ed's Best MaxxMem Submission
Global Rank
Global Team Power Rank
DDR SD-RAM
Team Power Rank
0.0 Points
Hardware Details
Processor
Model AMD Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice) Venice Cooling Water (Custom) Cores 3,047 MHz (+26.96%)
Comments
Current version is actually 2.01.
IMO db should be cleared with those old versions. If I remember correctly, there was some discussion about incorrect/cheated results.
Most of the guys with old scores have absolutely no fault.
I've updated my score and with old version I get 790 vs 710 with same settings and timings.
Thats true, but this is same situation like we had with wprime. Old versions had a major performance advantage. You cant beat those scores even with better clocks. Dont know what would be a fair solution but as maxxmem doesnt receive any points anyway I would say let them disappear...
maybe put the old results in an own section "maxxmem - old" and close it?
A moderator should do a split thread , so we can discuss freely about maxmem.
I don't think that the score split/blocking is worth the effort unless we can somehow guarantee that current/future versions will be consistent.
I don't think it's necessary. Leave it this way. I'm fine with it as long as we all use the latest version for the competition. I don't even run this bench and I wouldn't if it wasn't the competition
.
I have ran it and the score is about the same. I think his score is bugged
What are you getting with similar clocks?
Bypass max is wrong here, but everything else is tight enough
Edit: btw, expert and venus should be more efficient than ultra-d/sli-d, but I don't think the difference in read and write could be that huge.
Hmm, ok. So I will try with Expert, although my board can't clock BH5 very high for some reason.
I get sometimes similar read and write, but I thought it is bugged
Log in or register to comment