manually modified by owner (Johnny Bravo) - reason: no reason given
Johnny Bravo
manually modified by owner (Johnny Bravo) - reason: no reason given
Narmer - ClockMeUp!
reported by user due to lack of validation (where is cpu-z window?)
(crew) jmke
checked by a moderator (verification link OK; please in future add CPU-Z in the screenshot too;))
Legashmedt
reported by user due to lack of validation (no cpu-z and memory in Screenshots)
ScunnyUK
Very old result, reported, checked and ok'd by moderator in the past. Although cpu-z is not in the screenshot a link to cpu-z database has been provided.
der8auer
moderator changed status from 'reported by user due to lack of validation' to 'checked by a moderator' - reason: 4 year old score
The rules came into play in May 2008 (date is shown in the link posted above),This result was submitted on 30th April 2008, Presumably it was not mandatory to have cpu-z cpu + cpu-z memory tab in the screenshot at that time?.
However there is a link to the cpu-z database showing the required information and although this isnt compliant with the current rules today, it was reported by a user back then, subsequently moderated by hwbot staff and considered to be ok.
Comments
Vcore edited?
why the screenshot is not cpu-z and cpu-z@memory?
Not according to the rules filed a result of
read more:http://hwbot.org/news/876_application_3_rules/
The rules came into play in May 2008 (date is shown in the link posted above),This result was submitted on 30th April 2008, Presumably it was not mandatory to have cpu-z cpu + cpu-z memory tab in the screenshot at that time?.
However there is a link to the cpu-z database showing the required information and although this isnt compliant with the current rules today, it was reported by a user back then, subsequently moderated by hwbot staff and considered to be ok.
Log in or register to comment.