Submission Details
5 sec 797 mswith
Phenom II X6 1090T BE@5318.20 MHz
Rankings and Points
World Record Rank
6 Cores Global Rank
6 Cores
Phenom II X6 1090T BE
Rank
124th out of 274
- 18.6 Points
6 Cores Team Power Rank
6 Cores
Phenom II X6 1090T BE
Team Power Rank
Images
Hardware Details
Processor
Model AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE Thuban (6 Cores Active) Cooling Liquid Nitrogen Cores 5,318.2 MHz (+66%)
Comments
Hi dear friend.
How did you overclock your CPU up to 5300, but less than I Grftyn time?
The eclectic frequency is 5300
1.3 voltage.
It is impossible.
Generally your profile
The timing does not match the voltage and frequency together....
man report kardam peyghameto ali jan....in ferq ba ooon voltag joor dar nemiyad...bayad valid bezare
John F. Thank you.
There's a new one.
Look at people 99.
3600 Frequency and Time it?
Not fit!
The report had me in stitches
Don't pick on Max because he's slow.
Not sure what happend here. Summet is deff off. Sub is from the first year of benching. I dont care if the sub gets deleted or not. Not giving me any boints anyway
Dear friend.
You must do the thing you say to put the link to Valid.
In this test, you will not be accepted.
Even the memory and the motherboard header not even have a picture!
Also, please use your words too careful!
We're all friends here and we are gathered here to compete.
If your test is incorrect and fraud and why the fuck do not we have a say!
Hi again.
With me (ontheair) Yes, I've told you the right words.
Just you.
Boudin was a good test for the first time, but the effect was much better than Windows.
Summary sorry that I judged too soon.
I understand literally nothing of anything that has happened here.
LOL @ "My brain is full of bunny"
Gappo
This score was submitted in January of 2011. It is also submitted in the Extreme Overclocking League. The XOL does not require photos of the system, only the Enthusiast League does.
Basically, this is a very inefficient WPrime run. He probably had the benchmark on another HDD and it had to spin up at the start, hence the extremely slow time. I've done it myself with WPrime.
Calling it a cheat, especially since he gets no points for it, is a bit of a stretch. Reporting it is just silly.
Yeah, really incomprehensible.
I don't see what's the problem here.
CPUZ shows core VID, not the actual voltage and even if it was the actual voltage, it might be possible to run 5.3GHz with 1.3V on LN2 full pot.
Don't understand also why the score is questioned. It's horrible, yes, but how this invalidates it?
Hello.
Yes friends.
I have my weak English.
That's why I use google.
What else can!
Sorry for the meaning of words.
I am not cheating.
It was also
CPU frequency and time tested together, they did not fit.
Well aside.
It is important to learn from each other.
OC work together for progress.
He was talking with a friend of mine who said that the LN2 cooling method to lower the voltage to the processor is required.
Again, sorry friends...
By the way, if possible go and watch me test.
I'm happy to announce that you've lost.
Ninety people I'm eight.
Here is the link:
http://hwbot.org/submission/2415449_aliover_wprime___32m_phenom_ii_x6_1090t_be_5sec_687ms/
It is possible for benchmarks to run really slowly.
Any of these could have happened:
The voltage could (and probably was) read wrong by CPU-Z.
Log in or register to comment