was it actually 4066 or downclocked for screenshot, Scotty? I'm waaaay slower in terms of efficiency then and need to work it out.

Actual 4066.

Slot machine. Just keep pushing the button. Eventually you'll get a low time. Took me about 10 runs.

No science involved here.

7 hours ago, Mr.Scott said:

Slot machine.

Uh, why I was hoping for another unknown tweak?) Forgot it's wprime.

Win2k tweaked to the best of my knowledge is giving me rather stable 55.7xx @4066mhz. Should try multiple re-runs then.

9 minutes ago, TerraRaptor said:

Uh, why I was hoping for another unknown tweak?) Forgot it's wprime.

Win2k tweaked to the best of my knowledge is giving me rather stable 55.7xx @4066mhz. Should try multiple re-runs then.

You on Northwood 2?

1 hour ago, Leeghoofd said:

You on Northwood 2?

Yup, northwood with HT enabled, me personally is 4% behind Mr.Scott with same clocks.

Even if we take top-100 scores with P4 northwood, this result is the most efficient. Yet nothing criminal, just was hoping it is not me who sucks in efficiency (still, my efficiency is 226700) but Mr.Scott has downclocked it for screenshot.

15 hours ago, TerraRaptor said:

Yup, northwood with HT enabled, me personally is 4% behind Mr.Scott with same clocks.

Even if we take top-100 scores with P4 northwood, this result is the most efficient. Yet nothing criminal, just was hoping it is not me who sucks in efficiency (still, my efficiency is 226700) but Mr.Scott has downclocked it for screenshot.

No downclock for screenshot here. My run was at 4066. Only standard Wprime tweaks used. Minimal processes, realtime, TinyXP. 

Just kept hitting run. Had a couple runs in the 56 sec range also. 58's too. The more I ran it, the lower it got.

Should be caching then to work better and better. Hate wprime:)

I actually like Wprime, but it does have some flaws.