HWBOT Country Cup 2010 - 3DMark03

Closed Since 16 Jan

Details

Limitations

Ranking

Rank Participant Points Score
1 10 pts 12914 marks
2 8 pts 12494.67 marks
3 6 pts 11601.33 marks
4 5 pts 11597.67 marks
5 4 pts 9053 marks
6 3 pts 10093 marks
7 2 pts 9236.67 marks
8 1 pts 5321 marks
9 0 pts 5302.67 marks
10 0 pts 2892 marks
11 0 pts 2531.33 marks
12 0 pts 2479.33 marks
13 0 pts 2283.33 marks
14 0 pts 0 marks
15 0 pts 0 marks
16 0 pts 0 marks
17 0 pts 0 marks
18 0 pts 0 marks
19 0 pts 0 marks
20 0 pts 0 marks

Latest Submissions for Stage 3DMark03

Score Country User Hardware Cooling
7794 marks HD Graphics (Clarkdale) Water (Custom)
9785 marks Radeon HD 4290 Liquid Nitrogen
15261 marks HD Graphics 3000 Water (Custom)
9026 marks Radeon HD 4250 Air (Stock)
6123 marks HD Graphics (Clarkdale) Air (Custom)
13108 marks HD Graphics 2000 Liquid Nitrogen
13630 marks HD Graphics 2000 Liquid Nitrogen
2582 marks Radeon HD 3200 Graphics (RS780M) Air (Stock)
12461 marks HD Graphics 2000 Air (Custom)
13779 marks HD Graphics 2000 Cascade Phase Change

First Position

12914 marks Bulgaria

Participate

Discussions

January 2, 2011 at 12:08:22 AM UTC

3 scores have been submitted using "Ati Radeon HD 4200". I Believe this is not a "socket integrated" GPU and is infact integrated into the motherboard chipset. Therefore the scores are invalid?

 

Also will sandy bridge be allowed to enter this category? Thanks.

January 2, 2011 at 12:28:28 AM UTC

Official background - yes

 

'socket integrated' is a wrong term. Of course it's just 'integrated', both in the chipset as the cpu.

January 12, 2011 at 5:02:24 PM UTC

Can you add the Nvidia GO 7400 to your list of integrated gpus as it's not letting me submit my laptop scores, nothing earth shattering but better than some :)

 

Or do you mean the gpu is not a seperate chip.?

 

http://i775.photobucket.com/albums/yy31/monkyspanker/go7400.jpg

 

http://i775.photobucket.com/albums/yy31/monkyspanker/lappy.jpg

January 12, 2011 at 5:08:26 PM UTC

Yeah, 'integrated' means 'not separate chip'. So either on CPU or chipset.

 

7400GO is separate chip.

January 12, 2011 at 5:24:46 PM UTC

No problem, thanks for clearing that one up.

January 13, 2011 at 9:55:40 AM UTC

No one is going to use the latest technology? :P

January 16, 2011 at 11:02:59 AM UTC

Great rezults from all nations!

January 16, 2011 at 11:27:27 AM UTC

Congrats winners! Tell me please, how work 37 multiplayer with 4 cores? I can only 35 with 4 cores

January 16, 2011 at 11:32:10 AM UTC

Also I'm interested in the tweaks for such high GT1 (359.5fps) in the 13779 GMA HD 2000 score. We tested the same or even better settings and never got over 330 - 335fps...

January 16, 2011 at 11:39:23 AM UTC

Matose may be it is high clock for CPU

January 16, 2011 at 11:43:47 AM UTC

Multi was set for turbo from bios. Not many tweaks used just good chip I guess. Also if you use 2150 Mhz works better than 2151-2199. Only 2000,2050,2100,2200 Mhz core works good and anything else does not. Not to forget when you use i7 2600 you get higher multies for turbo :D

January 16, 2011 at 11:45:26 AM UTC

Congrats winners! Tell me please, how work 37 multiplayer with 4 cores? I can only 35 with 4 cores

 

It's the Turbo Boost... with little or no load, the Mobo was changing the multi as it pleased... I started SuperPI to make the CPU up it's MHz, but couldn't get a shot @3752, to show the benching freq., so I left it at 3966.... and that's why I entered 3966... it doesn't matter for the result itself...

January 16, 2011 at 11:46:22 AM UTC

Turbo enabled.

Default - 34.

For 4 cores - 35

For 3 cores - 36

For 2 cores - 37

For 1 cores - 38

January 16, 2011 at 11:49:00 AM UTC

Matose may be it is high clock for CPU

 

I think the difference is too big to be just the CPU frequency

January 16, 2011 at 11:52:44 AM UTC

Need wait moderators opinion.

January 16, 2011 at 11:54:36 AM UTC

del

January 16, 2011 at 12:36:07 PM UTC

So... you can't do such result, so you just remove it??? Really? That's really lame... it's like some people/nations just can't loose... I know, that XristoC has back up results with the same high GT1, so it's not a fluke...

 

No comment...

January 16, 2011 at 12:39:05 PM UTC

Well... my result has been removed. Can I know why this is so? If you do not believe to the screen shot - I can supply more, with similar results (although a bit lower - of course I have submitted only my best run). If you need verification of consistency - I can bench again and I will probably achieve very close performance in every test. I really feel this is not fair and if you punish me for a bug in the 3DMark03 - why didn't you punish the Russian team (whose work I really admire and, in fact, I am glad they got the first place which they deffinitely deserved) in Stage 2?!

January 16, 2011 at 12:39:51 PM UTC

Changed the IGP of this submission: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2107068_

 

First article stated all Core i7 2xxx series have the HD3000 on board; another article stated it's only the K-sku that has the 3000. So, changed it back -sigh-/

January 16, 2011 at 12:44:39 PM UTC

Only the "K"-s got the HD3000.... everything else got HD2000... ;)

 

So i think, that his result is OK.... or?

January 16, 2011 at 12:49:27 PM UTC

Yes. If only Intel would be able to use their "insane processing" technology to build a useful website where I can find that information ... :P

January 16, 2011 at 12:52:42 PM UTC

OMG, that is so unfair now - if we don't believe screenshots, what then?! There is no rule about using bugs, as far as I see, and the Russians in Stage 2 did the exact same thing. After all it's also too late for adding that rule. Plus, knowing bugs is also knowledge of a kind. The guys from Romania just can't take it, but why should everybody conform with them?! They act as if they couldn't be loosing to us!

January 16, 2011 at 12:54:17 PM UTC

So i think, that his result is OK.... or?

 

Yep. Already changed it in the database. I'm now waiting for the engine to stop being stubborn and change the overall result.

Log in or register to comment