23 pts XtremeSystems

Interesting

________

Nature's top shelf in long beach

I guess this will be Sempron 140/145 territory. Not sure what'll happen with big VGA configurations ... even Vantage must be CPU limited then

Massman i want to buy a intel celeron 356 (3.33) what do you say for this cpu? it's ok for this challenge?

It's okay per competition rules, but I'm not sure if it'll be competitive.

http://hwbot.org/hardware.compare.do?type=cpu&id=951_1&id=1415_1&id=1954_1

Why is the sempron so special/great/intel beater

i guess because of DDR3 support

You can have celerons with ddr3. Semprons are just newer better faster Check out the single core wprime rankings.

________

Chevrolet Montana Specifications

Not sure about the CPC, but the Semprons can be pushed to 5G+ ... as only single core CPUs.

I'm very interested to see how the Vantage thing will pan out. I'm not sure having 4 GPUs will even help; if the CPU bottleneck is too big, it's possible that 2 GPUs would be enough.

I can have also my celeron @ 5Ghz but not as good WPRime score as the sempron sigh. just bought a sempron, now I need motherboard and LN2, will see with my team

I've removed the necessity for verification URLs in this competition. The only thing it does is annoy people

I've removed the necessity for verification URLs in this competition. The only thing it does is annoy people

Thanks Massman. Was having trouble making my 3DmV result public last night anyway.

Any ideas about multi-gpu configurations for the 3rd stage?

I've removed the necessity for verification URLs in this competition. The only thing it does is annoy people

Arf too late I have already bought PCMark vantage

EDIT : 3DMark Vantage*

Arf too late I have already bought PCMark vantage Advance

Good job the comp is for pcmark 05 then lol

I think the orb link should stay... had enough of cheating for 1 day.

________

Motorcycle tires

can i use sempron in unlock mode? ) I think no, but better ask.

Heh... i think its my turn to win this competition . Hope my ud3p will be back from warranty. ( baby die :`( )

No unlocking allowed

Good job the comp is for pcmark 05 then lol

 

 

I think the orb link should stay... had enough of cheating for 1 day.

Wanted to say 3DMark not PCMark.

Anyway I have also bought PCMark Vantage, the free version is a fake, only one use and no score

am I missing something or can we just enable one core on any chip and it counts??

No, only native single cores

Any ideas about multi-gpu configurations for the 3rd stage?

I might try the 3870X2 with the P4 for kicks.

can I resubmit my old score ?

If it fits the limitations - yes

If it fits the limitations - yes

it's allowed to use an old score ? So we can use actual WR ?

Well, you cannot post someone else's scores of course.

Lol!

________

group Cams

Well, you cannot post someone else's scores of course.

sure, but the actual owner of the WR can easily win the competition

sure, but the actual owner of the WR can easily win the competition

Team effort and the WR owner for wprime x1 is from xtremelabs

PCmark x1 is from benchtec

and nobody has ever bothered to run vantage on an x1 competitively I don't think lol. Records are there to be broken

________

Vaporizer wholesale

not need verification screenshot? i want ask massman windows 7 32 bit or 64 bit does xp 32 is better? thanks

and nobody has ever bothered to run vantage on an x1 competitively I don't think lol.

Never say never(ever here) I have runed some vantage x1 to have WR (not for the fastest of course, for the slowest). And I am sure that massman also did some, he is better than me on underclocking.

Team effort and the WR owner for wprime x1 is from xtremelabs

PCmark x1 is from benchtec

 

and nobody has ever bothered to run vantage on an x1 competitively I don't think lol. Records are there to be broken

fix'd

PCmark x1 is from evocarlos @ benchtec

If it fits the limitations - yes

Woah! We definitely should come into the game then. Especially concerning my personal deadline failure with GT 220 last month -)

For reference:

Stage 1 WR - http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1014090_evocarlos_pcmark_2005_celeron_lga775_440_14442_marks

Stage 2 WR - http://hwbot.org/community/submission/979243_nick.ua_wprime_32m_sempron_140_24sec_390ms

Stage 3 WR - http://hwbot.org/community/submission/983388_parcifal_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_9800_gt_6791_marks

I'm not 100% sure of the last one, but ... maybe 95%

100 Legit entry :

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1061427_christian_ney_pcmark_2005_pentium_4_630_9196_marks

I think I belive you lol.

________

large tits Webcam

Massman

How to right apply old results?

Re-submit?

Massman

 

How to right apply old results?

Look at my video, even if in my own opinion it shouldn't be allowed

can I resubmit my old score ?

If it fits the limitations - yes

I mean submit my old WR. If i right understand you, its not a problem?

using old scores

whats the point in the compo?

It's not a problem to submit old results.

Do note: exposing your old records might cause other people to want to hunt 'em down and break them

using old scores

whats the point in the compo?

To push even harder than before.

Massman thanks for the clarification

I try too upgrade my scores in october on semprons 145 )

May be I'll resubmit my old score too

Is it interesting to buy 10 OCZ Vertex 2 ? to break the PCMark05 1xCPU WR ?

on my Asus Commando and 3 additional SATA RAID controlers ?

What can I reach ? ( xxx Mo/s ) on XP stratup

Is it interesting to buy 10 OCZ Vertex 2 ? to break the PCMark05 1xCPU WR ?

on my Asus Commando and 3 additional SATA RAID controlers ?

What can I reach ? ( xxx Mo/s ) on XP stratup

xp startup will of course exceed the 220mb/s limit. you'll have to bring it down.

which cpu are you planning to use on the commando?

using old scores

whats the point in the compo?

IMHO it makes life a little bit easier when competing for fun in multi-stage tasks.

p.s. actually don't know the exact reason for this case.

xp startup will of course exceed the 220mb/s limit. you'll have to bring it down.

which cpu are you planning to use on the commando?

What is the problem to exceed 220 mo/s ? the objective is to have the better score isn't it ?

My P4 630 with HT @ 4.6 Ghz on air

EDIT1 : Just read the rules OMG, after hardware limited cards, there is benchmark scores limitations LOL. Strange I have seen submissions with a lot more than 220 mo/s (like 275 mo/s and sometimes more).

EDIT2 :

Okay - I am done with being secretive and want to play with all my cards on the table. So, I have made a video and after you have seen it, you will be able to be as good as me. That is, of course, if you are talented enough for SuperPI32, because after all this benchmark is not about hardware, but it's about the human pushing the buttons!

 

I am going to do massman's tweak :

copy big file

recopy big file

another big file

start PCMark05

then the score is : 8mb/s like my very old IBM IDE 4 Go HDD

EDIT3 : ADVERTISING : ( work for Thor941 again ) I am going to check(and report as i am not a moderator) a lot of PCMark05 results. Be careful. The hunting is open

EDIT4 : Hunting closed for today, seems that submissions I have seen with more than 220 mo/s has already been removed. Good to see that cleaning was done before my hunting

What is the problem to exceed 220 mo/s ? the objective is to have the better score isn't it ?

 

My P4 630 with HT @ 4.6 Ghz on air

it will be a waste of money since this cpu under air won't beat the pcmark 1xcpu wr for sure.

edit: btw. plz edit your posts and don't make 5 posts in a row.

it will be a waste of money since this cpu under air won't beat the pcmark 1xcpu wr for sure.

Is this a challenge you give me, ok, My objective is to break the WR with this CPU right now.

edit: btw. plz edit your posts and don't make 5 posts in a row.

done, sorry, I was on the iphone, now I am back to a computer

Is this a challenge you give me, ok, My objective is to break the WR with this CPU right now.

 

good luck

good luck

Thx

I can never get pc mark to give me a final score. the cpu tests never finish. I have the encoder installed and the pcmark patch. What is happening? this is the free version. I run into this every time I run it regardless of system im benching. is there a trick to this? No wonder I have no pc mark benches listed on the orb. I never got it to work.

Install latest patch and Futuremark SystemInfo Hotfix. Used Windows Vista or 7 more easily. 1st try to run with default hardware setting .

you ran it as administrator ? (ignore if not in vista or win7)

I can never get pc mark to give me a final score. the cpu tests never finish. I have the encoder installed and the pcmark patch. What is happening? this is the free version. I run into this every time I run it regardless of system im benching. is there a trick to this? No wonder I have no pc mark benches listed on the orb. I never got it to work.

Can you show us the details window that we can see which test failed.

I have a question.

I'm guessing it may not be allowed but I'll ask it anyway.

I have a dual CPU Socket A board and of course a pair of CPU's for it, both being native single core chips. Since there would be no unlocking involved or use of a chip with more than a single core, could this be considered legal?

I know even this may not do so well but still, it would be fun to see how it stacks up anyway. Just one of those "For the hell of it" attempts if allowed.

Not allowed. The idea is to have a single core system and OC the crap out of it. I'll add it to the benchmark limitations.

Yesterday night I tested the GTX480 with a 3800+ Venice CPU. Managed to outperform a (much more recent) Celeron 430 in Vantage by 20%

Not allowed.

Thanks for the reply.

Since this seemed to fit the rules at the time, wanted to be sure before I did anything.

The idea is to have a single core system and OC the crap out of it..

Believe I can manage that one well enough.

Yeah, seen it's going well for you guys!

As Oliver says: "keep pushing it!"

Is 233MB/s allowed . Damn with the P4 630 I can't go down more than 230.

EDIT : Damn reached to go down to 217MB/s but the audio compression test failed at the end.

Is 233MB/s allowed . Damn with the P4 630 I can't go down more than 230.

 

EDIT : Damn reached to go down to 217MB/s but the audio compression test failed at the end.

looks like too much oc on the cpu.

looks like too much oc on the cpu.

Yep, damn with 307mhz it's not ok, but 306 yes. AND AFTER 58 RUNs, I got the score.

It's not the WR but ....

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1063182_christian_ney_pcmark_2005_pentium_4_630_13002_marks?new=true

(I have half reached the challenge you gave me)

nice, but this run is not valid, your xp startup is over 220mb/s.

you must be under 220, so 219.999 is the max.

this run is not valid, your xp startup is over 220mb/s.

you must be under 220, so 219.999 is the max.

220 ==== 220.326

Maybe it increased the score of 2 pts.

I can submite 13000 if you want.

Please I am benching this CPU since 6 hours

220 ==== 220.326

 

Maybe it increased the score of 2 pts.

I can submite 13000 if you want.

 

Please I am benching this CPU since 6 hours

rules are rules i'm sorry, i didn't make those.

rules are rules i'm sorry, i didn't make those.

I know, arf, for 0.326 mb/s. Damn, I know that my P4 630 is hating me like hell by now.

I am going to do another 10 runs.

I know, arf, for 0.326 mb/s. Damn, I know that my P4 630 is hating me like hell by now.

 

I am going to do another 10 runs.

wiggle ur mouse during the xp start up it will get rig of the .3xx for you

nice result carlos

nice result carlos

thanks mate

wiggle ur mouse during the xp start up it will get rig of the .3xx for you

Thx, I was still using CrystalDiskMark to reduce the test @ 220MB/s, but it's rare to have 220Mb/s, very often 230Mb/s.

Anyway I am going to have a ''rules ok'' result ASAP

EDIT : Even a better result than Evocarlos , back to the lead (of stage 1 )

lol don't worry about that

________

Genetically modified food

yeah, the benchtec bros are always strong here. they are always my toughest rivals in pcmark05

i think i'll bench some single cores soon as well.

That run is still suspect Christian Ney. Lower sub-scores all around than Evocarlos and with a lesser graphics card? Your HDD General usage time is obscured as are your encoding times. Not saying it's a cheat just saying it looks pretty off to me. It's pretty easy to tweak the 1st multi-thread test using Powertoy you know.

That run is still suspect Christian Ney. Lower sub-scores all around than Evocarlos and with a lesser graphics card? Your HDD General usage time is obscured as are your encoding times. Not saying it's a cheat just saying it looks pretty off to me. It's pretty easy to tweak the 1st multi-thread test using Powertoy you know.

Nothing like calling a spade a spade, is there?

Nothing like calling a spade a spade, is there?

I understand. It's a valid request.

yeah, the benchtec bros are always strong here. they are always my toughest rivals in pcmark05

i think i'll bench some single cores soon as well.

Prffft I smack you and Bench bros around in 478 and 462 almost weekly.

Prffft I smack you and Bench bros around in 478 and 462 almost weekly.

ahh thats only casue you bought all the 478 cpus and we cant get them in the uk haha j/k

tbh i dont have a 478 mobo i actully dont know what is a good one to buy ?

That run is still suspect Christian Ney. Lower sub-scores all around than Evocarlos and with a lesser graphics card? Your HDD General usage time is obscured as are your encoding times. Not saying it's a cheat just saying it looks pretty off to me. It's pretty easy to tweak the 1st multi-thread test using Powertoy you know.

i will quote my slef from a post on bt

yeah had tryed a encoder program like power toy about 6months ago and a diffrent encoder but the main thing is hwbot rules apply anything that alters the benchmark defaults or the way it runs is invalid so i just run the stock pcm05 no software mods..

 

pro also did the program for the encoder it was a pic of a guy in a mankinie

 

heres what it does to my dally rig

 

before

 

run the app

 

after

 

its very easy to spot and if you see a ss with the vid encoding score coverd by cpu-z or gpu-z you never know they might be using..

 

the vid encoding shold be about 75% less than the audio encoding

e.g if audio was 4000 the vid encoding shold be around the 1000 -1200 mark

 

 

Exactly. I can put up 13000+ too with Powertoy. I run legit though. Nice run in the challenge BTW Evo

It's my freak of a 7900Gs that kills you guys in 478 and 462. Shhh! Don't tell anyone.

Thank you Evocarlos, that pretty much validates what my team mate is saying.

Prffft I smack you and Bench bros around in 478 and 462 almost weekly.

yeah i've noticed it. i'll have to retest some cpus tough.

ahh thats only casue you bought all the 478 cpus and we cant get them in the uk haha j/k

 

tbh i dont have a 478 mobo i actully dont know what is a good one to buy ?

Only the resolution and quality altering in powertoy is forbidden, am I right? Stuff like priority is OK?

On topic though Christian Ney's run needs be transparent and it's not. If he can reproduce the score AND show the correct sub-scores then fine and well done. If not then it should come down.

On topic though Christian Ney's run needs be transparent and it's not. If he can reproduce the score AND show the correct sub-scores then fine and well done. If not then it should come down.

Same system and you can see the HDD general usage :

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1063085_christian_ney_pcmark_2005_celeron_lga775_352_10831_marks

Benched few hours before

Same system and you can see the HDD general usage :

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1063085_christian_ney_pcmark_2005_celeron_lga775_352_10831_marks

 

Benched few hours before

That looks right for a Celeron D @ those clocks. There's a big gap between 10,000 and 13,000 boss. So what did you do to get that huge score you submitted that you didn't want to show/us to see?

Same system @ the same clocks and a 3000 point gap? Come on man please post the legit score and keep this competition clean.

That looks right for a Celeron D @ those clocks. There's a big gap between 10,000 and 13,000 boss. So what did you do to get that huge score you submitted that you didn't want to show/us to see?

 

Same system @ the same clocks and a 3000 point gap? Come on man please post the legit score and keep this competition clean.

not same clock, and celeron is without HT and P4 is with HT.

It wasn't plan to hide the score, I was tired after 63 runs, as the system was unstable I quickly opened cpu-z and gpuz to take a screenshot.

Now, I have seen that I have less sub-scores than evocarlos, so there is something weird here. So I rerun PCMark05 but with 300 mhz FSB, and the score is around 12000 WoW, I thing one of the multithreading test was bugged for my 13000s submissions, as often the audio compressions test was failing, maybe this time he bugged so it gave me higher score.( or an other end test )

=> I am going to remove 13000s score right now.

You all were right, thank you.

Regards ( and sorry for that, I was thinking that when a test was going wrong, it just failed, not bugged )

That run is still suspect Christian Ney. Lower sub-scores all around than Evocarlos and with a lesser graphics card? Your HDD General usage time is obscured as are your encoding times. Not saying it's a cheat just saying it looks pretty off to me. It's pretty easy to tweak the 1st multi-thread test using Powertoy you know.

What is powertoy ?

And how to use a program as PCMark is going to abort tests if you leave his window ?

For me it seems impossible to cheat with PCMark, do you have a proof or a video ?

What is powertoy ?

 

And how to use a program as PCMark is going to abort tests if you leave his window ?

For me it seems impossible to cheat with PCMark, do you have a proof or a video ?

see the pictures in post #80

see the pictures in post #80

WoW thank you, I didn't know. I am speechless.

That's why everybody was thinking my submission was bad

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1063373_chew_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_5870_10188_marks

Seeing this run, I wonder if the Pentium 600 series (HT, cedar mill) could play a role in the Vantage ranking at 7G+ ...

Good to see which is the best 3D platform for old-skool systems:

yeah, athlon 64 ftw.

Damn I havn't got any athlon 64

No worries - A64 is just decent if you compare clock-per-clock GPU score performance. The most important part of the Vantage score with this type of CPU is the CPU score and A64 doesn't go high enough.

No worries - A64 is just decent if you compare clock-per-clock GPU score performance. The most important part of the Vantage score with this type of CPU is the CPU score and A64 doesn't go high enough.

As I am on air, , I have a good PCMark05 and a good 3DMrak Vantage(). This OC Challenge is finished for me now. Cannot have better scores. And my team don't care about OC Challenges so.....(shame on them )

EDIT : Ho, I forget to said also my Weakest Entry Ever for Wprime32M

Don't worry. The sempron scales

________

EFFECTS OF NEXIUM

Sempron won't take PCMark05. A P4 HT Cedarmill on LN2 will as the Sempron will fall behind in the multithreaded tests. Probably Vantage as well.

I can almost guarantee I'll break 14000 with a P4 Cedarmill before the contest is over. I predict 15000 will be broken by someone else.

Sempron should take the P4 in the memory benchmarks, though.

Sempron should take the P4 in the memory benchmarks, though.

Maybe boss but I just don't think the Sempy has the juice. Someone will crank a Cedarmill up to 8Ghz on LN2 with a 5870, A-card, and some DDr3 @ tight ass timings and take the top spot. Like I said I will break 14000+ by the time this over maybe 15000.

Hum,

Running PCMrak05 @ 8GHz lol:D.

Want to see

Hum,

Running PCMrak05 @ 8GHz lol:D.

 

Want to see

LOL! I won't hit 8Ghz unless I am EXTREMELY lucky. I'll probably hit 7 give or take a few but who knows. I'll say one thing though I won't take the top spot. Too many big guns w too much juice waiting in the wings. For one I can't afford an A-card or a bunch of SSD's. Best I can squeeze out of my i-ram is 185Mb/s which ain't bad but not top tier material.

Look him,

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1063397_remiko_pcmark_2005_sempron_145_11933_marks

only one OCZ Vertex 2 ( he has got 200 MB/s, I have got only Vertex 1 ( indilix barefoot ), Vertex 2 is with Sandforce. And the Vertex 2 40GB is cheap.

RemiKo is using a Vertex 2 PRO drive - this is not your regular Vertex 2. It's much more expensive and much faster. I tried regular Vertex 2 60 GB - it did around 90 MB/s in XP Startup.

RemiKo is using a Vertex 2 PRO drive - this is not your regular Vertex 2. It's much more expensive and much faster. I tried regular Vertex 2 60 GB - it did around 90 MB/s in XP Startup.

Thank for the news, I was planning to buy the vertex 2, but accordingto the web, perfomance are the same with the pro, seems there is something with firmware.

EDIT : 5 of my ocz vertex are back to the store. Maybe an ocz revodrive 50GB would be good. I am not good with SSDs , do you know what it can expect with one revodrive on windows startup ? (imo ~ 275mo/s like two Vertex 2 in RAID )

I'm very interested to see how the Vantage thing will pan out. I'm not sure having 4 GPUs will even help; if the CPU bottleneck is too big, it's possible that 2 GPUs would be enough.

Anyway from now I'm totally sure that even 5,6+ GHz Sempron is not a pair for TOP VGAs at all. Some slight improvements are possible by picking up the less CPU-depending cards and/or additional overclocking but nobody will be able to get much more than has already been done.

You cracked the code

You cracked the code

Hey Thats my line!

what was the best date code for cedar mill 356?

Mr Massman, very nice pcm05 there sir!

Thanks!

Using just one Acard, but XP startup is going >220MB/s most of the time ... so this is a lucky run. Virus scan is pretty low, though

Hm.

If I run my Virus Scan subtest separatly, I get a result of 193MB/s. When I do a full run, it's ~50MB/s.

Someone an idea?

Im in the same boat massman. Really really annoying me.

I still get under 100 on its own tho

Done a lot of pcmark today, rather tired.

[hwbot=1069846]submission[/hwbot]

________

Urraco

This is a bad run:http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1069759_stevero_pcmark_2005_celeron_lga775_440_13807_marks Those HDD scores are WAY off!

This is a bad run:http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1069759_stevero_pcmark_2005_celeron_lga775_440_13807_marks Those HDD scores are WAY off!

Actually its not.......see my comment in his result if you have any questions.

Sometimes its best to look before leaping.

5 acards stacked, looks like he's "warming up" ( massman loves that phrase )......only looks like 2 are on for that run

Doesn't matter chew. There's a 220mb/s limit period not just for XP start up the only reason it's specified is that it's the most visible. If that's not so then I can run HDD general usage off a "soft" RAM DISK and jump above 13000 pts myself.

If were going to not hold the participants to the ORB guidelines say the word and let's have a free for all. Break out the powertoy and browser of your choice kids and let's get it on.

Doesn't matter chew. There's a 220mb/s limit period not just for XP start up the only reason it's specified is that it's the most visible. If that's not so then I can run HDD general usage off a "soft" RAM DISK and jump above 13000 pts myself.

 

If were going to not hold the participants to the ORB guidelines say the word and let's have a free for all. Break out the powertoy and browser of your choice kids and let's get it on.

IE is still faster than them all if thats the case

But yah i'm not playing this round. Don't have the correct hardware.

I dunno ask massman, I think the cap is for Xp startup only mate, and software ram drives are illegal even the mere suggestion of using one is not something I would be doing, hardware ram drives are fine.

I guess you want to contest this result to, and this one and this one......seems hwbot is not banning scores...........bottom line reason is it's done with "real hardware" not in software.

http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/1064101_adw_2010_pcmark05_team_pcmark_2005_core_i7_980x_38080_marks

http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/1063063_pro_pcmark_2005_core_i7_980x_36198_marks

http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/1059805_stevero_pcmark_2005_core_i7_980x_35511_marks

- Cap is for XP startup only

- Usage of software ramdisks is prohibited

- It's quite clear that SteveRo has the hw to pull off those scores

That why we need a clean database with HDD results, I have open a free one here :

http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=11796

But we need more results, and unfortunately I haven't got any I-ram, A-Cards.

Maybe I can test ram disk under differents system to see what we get.(celeron, P4, Core2Duo, DDR2, DDR3)

Motherboard bug alert.

Biostar TA785GE 128M

Basically with a specific bios, umm check Elgappos result, its same bios. ( 07/01/2010 )

Boot stock defaults.

Install biostar T clock utility.

Reboot.

Run fsb up in windows with utility from default 200 to 205 bus apply and congrats you have just killed your sempron 140.

Tested on 2 cpu's so yes its confirmed, any takers to try on other model cpu's be my guest, i'm straight having killed 2 cpu's testing bug.

motherboard Bug Alert.

 

Biostar Ta785ge 128m

 

Basically With A Specific Bios, Umm Check Elgappos Result, Its Same Bios. ( 07/01/2010 )

 

Boot Stock Defaults.

 

Install Biostar T Clock Utility.

 

Reboot.

 

Run Fsb Up In Windows With Utility From Default 200 To 205 Bus Apply And Congrats You Have Just Killed Your Sempron 140.

 

Tested On 2 Cpu's So Yes Its Confirmed, Any Takers To Try On Other Model Cpu's Be My Guest, I'm Straight Having Killed 2 Cpu's Testing Bug.

Rma ;)

Motherboard bug alert.

 

Biostar TA785GE 128M

 

Basically with a specific bios, umm check Elgappos result, its same bios. ( 07/01/2010 )

 

Boot stock defaults.

 

Install biostar T clock utility.

 

Reboot.

 

Run fsb up in windows with utility from default 200 to 205 bus apply and congrats you have just killed your sempron 140.

 

Tested on 2 cpu's so yes its confirmed, any takers to try on other model cpu's be my guest, i'm straight having killed 2 cpu's testing bug.

WOW unlucky, I couldn't even get toverclocker to work, just showed 0mhz for everything...

Will let the bios guy know tomorrow.. Thanks for the heads up.

Wondering why only my memory controller suffered now...

________

MARIJUANA INDICA

Rma ;)

Had I never oced cpu ever , I might be inclined to.

Was actually prepping to run vantage on a 480 and was lazy so used software in windows to calculate scaling.

Having killed it I swapped in a dud sempron.

Same exact thing.

I'm used to it this week by now, can't wait till sunday is over, bad luck week for me. Stars are not alligned in my favor.

$2000 in hardware deaths, not a happy camper.

Overclocking doesn't kill hardware, people do.

Leeghoofd has blackmailed me into doing another round of PCMark on the Crosshair Extreme. Soo little time ...

Overclocking doesn't kill hardware, people do.