HWBOT Team CUP 2023 - AMD @ HWBOT

General Rules

General and benchmark specific hwbot rules apply

Desktop hardware only (no server/workstation parts) unless explicitly allowed at stage rules

No ES, nor unreleased hardware

One bencher can only contribute once for each stage

For the stages that require several results, different CPUs / GPUs / MEM types are needed (example: LGA1150 cpu bench with three results needs 4790, 4770K, 4690, if three different benchers submit three results with 4770k only one will count to the ranking)

General Software Rules

Only Microsoft operating Systems allowed

BenchMate 10.12.2 version only

CPU-Z 2.06 or newer unless specifically mentioned

GPU-Z 2.50 or newer unless specifically mentioned

All other benchmark versions need to be updated including eg the Systeminfo 2.64.1188 or newer

Monitoring, systeminfo remain enabled for all UL Benchmarks

General Verification Rules

2D scores require CPU-Z tabs for CPU, Memory and Motherboard
3D scores require CPU-Z tabs for CPU, Memory and Motherboard and GPU-Z for each graphics card
2D Memory Stage scores require CPU-Z tabs for CPU, Memory, Motherboard and SPD for each Dimm unless specified.
3Dmark11 PhysX stages also require GPU-Z verification

Competition Wallpaper is mandatory for participation

Standard verification rules remain applicable, check them out here (click)

Sub-competitions

Each sub-competition consists of multiple stages. Check the stages for specific rules.

The point distribution of each stage is: 50-47-45-43-41-39-37-35-33-31-29-27-25-23-21-19-17-15-13-11-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 besides the SDR SDRAM memory stage which tops at 30pts

Art design by DaQuteness

Ranking

#	Participant	Stage 1	Stage 2	Stage 3	Stage 4	Stage 5	Points
1	Overclock.net	36 sec 963 ms 60 pts	1 min 46 sec 450 ms 65 pts	33867.67 MIPS 65 pts	8221 points 65 pts	50 sec 809 ms 56 pts	311 pts
2	Team Hardware-Reaktor-Reloaded	24 sec 273 ms 53 pts	1 min 54 sec 248 ms 60 pts	32678.67 MIPS 60 pts	7882 points 56 pts	46 sec 711 ms 65 pts	294 pts
3	Wegg	22 sec 370 ms 56 pts	1 min 56 sec 975 ms 56 pts	28455.33 MIPS 56 pts	8207 points 60 pts	48 sec 995 ms 60 pts	288 pts
4	Warp9-systems	36 sec 837 ms 65 pts	2 min 0 sec 449 ms 53 pts	26673.33 MIPS 50 pts	5724.33 points 50 pts	33 sec 983 ms 43 pts	261 pts
5	Overclockers.UA	26 sec 537 ms 45 pts	1 min 19 sec 45 ms 47 pts	23004.33 MIPS 47 pts	6219.67 points 53 pts	1 min 9 sec 198 ms 53 pts	245 pts
6	Team Russia	13 sec 147 ms 37 pts	2 min 2 sec 120 ms 50 pts	27404.67 MIPS 53 pts	2900.67 points 47 pts	29 sec 9 ms 47 pts	234 pts
7	ExtremeHW	29 sec 420 ms 41 pts	1 min 36 sec 992 ms 45 pts	7361 MIPS 37 pts	3631.33 points 43 pts	30 sec 684 ms 45 pts	211 pts
8	Cowcotland	12 sec 947 ms 39 pts	39 sec 671 ms 43 pts	12915.33 MIPS 43 pts	3684.33 points 45 pts	40 sec 347 ms 41 pts	211 pts
9	Team MLG	15 sec 380 ms 33 pts	40 sec 826 ms 41 pts	22045.33 MIPS 45 pts		11 sec 306 ms 35 pts	154 pts
10	Team Hungary	27 sec 290 ms 43 pts	42 sec 580 ms 39 pts	6941 MIPS 31 pts	1362.33 points 31 pts		144 pts

Participant

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 3

Stage 4

Stage 5

Points

Overclock.net

36 sec 963 ms

60 pts

1 min 46 sec 450 ms

65 pts

33867.67 MIPS

65 pts

8221 points

65 pts

50 sec 809 ms

56 pts

311 pts

Team Hardware-Reaktor-Reloaded

24 sec 273 ms

53 pts

1 min 54 sec 248 ms

60 pts

32678.67 MIPS

60 pts

7882 points

56 pts

46 sec 711 ms

65 pts

294 pts

Wegg

22 sec 370 ms

56 pts

1 min 56 sec 975 ms

56 pts

28455.33 MIPS

56 pts

8207 points

60 pts

48 sec 995 ms

60 pts

288 pts

Warp9-systems

36 sec 837 ms

65 pts

2 min 0 sec 449 ms

53 pts

26673.33 MIPS

50 pts

5724.33 points

50 pts

33 sec 983 ms

43 pts

261 pts

Overclockers.UA

26 sec 537 ms

45 pts

1 min 19 sec 45 ms

47 pts

23004.33 MIPS

47 pts

6219.67 points

53 pts

1 min 9 sec 198 ms

53 pts

245 pts

Team Russia

13 sec 147 ms

37 pts

2 min 2 sec 120 ms

50 pts

27404.67 MIPS

53 pts

2900.67 points

47 pts

29 sec 9 ms

47 pts

234 pts

ExtremeHW

29 sec 420 ms

41 pts

1 min 36 sec 992 ms

45 pts

7361 MIPS

37 pts

3631.33 points

43 pts

30 sec 684 ms

45 pts

211 pts

Cowcotland

12 sec 947 ms

39 pts

39 sec 671 ms

43 pts

12915.33 MIPS

43 pts

3684.33 points

45 pts

40 sec 347 ms

41 pts

211 pts

Team MLG

15 sec 380 ms

33 pts

40 sec 826 ms

41 pts

22045.33 MIPS

45 pts

11 sec 306 ms

35 pts

154 pts

Team Hungary

27 sec 290 ms

43 pts

42 sec 580 ms

39 pts

6941 MIPS

31 pts

1362.33 points

31 pts

144 pts

Discussions

superpatodonaldo

June 16, 2023 at 6:50:13 AM UTC

Why 4P cpus? Just 4core enabled?

yosarianilives

June 16, 2023 at 2:41:47 PM UTC

7 hours ago, superpatodonaldo said:

Why 4P cpus? Just 4core enabled?

One core per module enabled

Luke

July 24, 2023 at 10:23:46 PM UTC

@Leeghoofd can you clarify? Can we just disable cores to meet the 4 core requirement?

Mr.Scott

July 25, 2023 at 12:25:46 AM UTC

2 hours ago, damric said:

@Leeghoofd can you clarify? Can we just disable cores to meet the 4 core requirement?

Never

mickulty

July 25, 2023 at 7:51:59 AM UTC

9 hours ago, damric said:

@Leeghoofd can you clarify? Can we just disable cores to meet the 4 core requirement?

The "4P" option represents one core per compute unit mode - certainly available on gigabyte boards, supposedly a certain bios on CHV, not sure about asrock and msi. It was added because it's vaguely analagous to p-core modes on ADL (rankings like 12900K (8P)).

The difference compared to just disabling cores is that each core gets a full 3-wide decoder 100% of the time, a full 256-bit FPU 100% of the time, and an exlusive 2MB of L2 cache. You can look at ths as the "P-core" and the extra integer units that normally share these resources as the "E-core". Another way to think of it is disabling CMT.

I found a screenshot of the settings on a 990FX-UD7 but even cheapo gigabyte AM3+ boards like the 78LMT-USB3 have the setting. Also attached are block diagrams (By Shigeru23 - Made by uploader, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=17130259) annotated to show the difference.

Realistically a 78LMT-USB3 even being a fairly bunnyextraction board but with true 1 core per cu mode will still beat a crosshair with disabled cores. Imagine 12900K with 4P and 4E-cores vs 8P...

Luke

July 25, 2023 at 3:39:23 PM UTC

I'm talking about the AM4 section but I guess that also applies.

leeghoofd

July 25, 2023 at 5:22:18 PM UTC

Correct, no core disabling to simulate another CPU allowed