HWBOT OC Challenge December 2010
Closed
Official
Online
12.01.2010 00:00 +0000
12.31.2010 23:59 +0000
Participate
-
This competition is closed. You can no longer join
-
HWBOT OC Challenge December 2010 is closed since 31 December 2010
-
This competition is between teams
Ranking
Rank
|
Participant
|
PI-32M S462 |
PI-32M S478 |
PI-32M S754 |
PI-32M S370 |
PI-32M S939 |
PTS
|
1 |
|
5 pts
|
10 pts
|
8 pts
|
8 pts
|
6 pts
|
37 pts
|
2 |
|
8 pts
|
|
10 pts
|
6 pts
|
1 pts
|
25 pts
|
3 |
|
|
5 pts
|
1 pts
|
2 pts
|
10 pts
|
18 pts
|
4 |
|
3 pts
|
4 pts
|
5 pts
|
3 pts
|
3 pts
|
18 pts
|
5 |
|
4 pts
|
3 pts
|
6 pts
|
4 pts
|
0 pts
|
17 pts
|
6 |
|
|
6 pts
|
|
10 pts
|
0 pts
|
16 pts
|
7 |
|
6 pts
|
|
|
|
8 pts
|
14 pts
|
8 |
|
10 pts
|
|
|
|
|
10 pts
|
9 |
|
|
8 pts
|
|
|
|
8 pts
|
10 |
|
|
0 pts
|
|
5 pts
|
|
5 pts
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 pts
|
5 pts
|
12 |
|
|
0 pts
|
4 pts
|
|
|
4 pts
|
13 |
|
|
|
2 pts
|
|
2 pts
|
4 pts
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 pts
|
4 pts
|
15 |
|
|
|
3 pts
|
|
|
3 pts
|
16 |
|
|
2 pts
|
|
1 pts
|
|
3 pts
|
17 |
|
2 pts
|
|
|
|
|
2 pts
|
18 |
|
1 pts
|
0 pts
|
|
|
0 pts
|
1 pts
|
19 |
|
|
1 pts
|
|
|
|
1 pts
|
20 |
|
|
0 pts
|
|
|
|
0 pts
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
0 pts
|
|
0 pts
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
0 pts
|
|
0 pts
|
23 |
|
|
0 pts
|
|
0 pts
|
|
0 pts
|
Awarded Season Points
Rank
|
Team
|
Season Points
|
Active Members
|
No points have been awarded in this competition
|
Thinking about it ... I think our team will have to Ebay to get some stages donedata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba8f3/ba8f32e9d7d15274cb8b3ffde839b4cea373e9ea" alt=":D"
Here are the current records:
Stage 1: SOCKET 462
- 1751.219 - Turrican with Athlon XP-M 2600+ @ 3094.00 MHz
- 1777.880 - tiborrr with Athlon XP-M 2500+ @ 3057.00 MHz
- 1791.550 - tiborrr with Athlon XP 2200+ Thoroughbred @ 3094.00 MHz
- 1805.750 - tiborrr with Athlon XP 1700+ Thoroughbred @ 3082.00 MHz
- 1824.250 - Jaan with Athlon XP-M 2500+ @ 2910.80 MHz
- 1830.950 - tiborrr with Athlon XP 2400+ Thoroughbred @ 3008.00 MHz
- 1834.800 - tiborrr with Athlon XP 3000+ @ 2967.00 MHz
- 1846.085 - mare87 with Athlon XP-M 2600+ @ 2825.30 MHz
- 1854.990 - TASOS with Athlon XP-M 2500+ @ 2900.00 MHz
- 1879.910 - tiborrr with Athlon XP 2800+ @ 2923.00 MHz
Stage 2: SOCKET 478
- 1322.990 - TASOS with Pentium 4 3.2 GHz Prescott @ 4763.00 MHz
- 1404.900 - Turrican with Celeron s478 335 @ 5073.00 MHz
- 1447.161 - Turrican with Pentium 4 2.8 GHz A Prescott @ 4597.00 MHz
- 1467.000 - doctor with Pentium 4 3.2 GHz Prescott @ 4502.00 MHz
- 1471.330 - Turrican with Celeron s478 340 @ 4922.00 MHz
- 1489.375 - Caos Wolf with Pentium 4 3.0 GHz Prescott @ 4465.00 MHz
- 1509.828 - qwerty84 with Celeron s478 330 @ 4469.00 MHz
- 1510.240 - Turrican with Celeron s478 330 @ 4709.00 MHz
- 1512.840 - skydec with Celeron s478 330 @ 4570.00 MHz
- 1520.187 - Gamer with Pentium 4 2.8 GHz A Prescott @ 4500.00 MHz
Stage 3: SOCKET 754
- 1526.469 - Mickael with Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ (Newark) @ 3219.00 MHz
- 1527.641 - knopflerbruce with Sempron 64 3100+ (S754, Palermo) @ 3134.90 MHz
- 1531.266 - knopflerbruce with Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ (Newark) @ 3075.80 MHz
- 1554.470 - oxyyy with Athlon 64 3200+ Venice s754 @ 3108.00 MHz
- 1554.547 - ZorchThatCPU with Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ (Newark) @ 3005.00 MHz
- 1555.906 - knopflerbruce with Athlon 64 3000+ Venice s754 @ 3000.10 MHz
- 1559.937 - knopflerbruce with Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ (Newark) @ 2952.20 MHz
- 1562.740 - ZorchThatCPU with Mobile Athlon 64 4000+ (Newark) @ 3088.00 MHz
- 1564.609 - hs with Sempron 64 3400+ (S754, Palermo) @ 3100.00 MHz
- 1573.328 - oxyyy with Sempron 64 3300+ (Palermo) @ 3100.00 MHz
Stage 4: SOCKET 370
- 3884.240 - GraduS with Pentium 3 Celeron 1.3Ghz @ 2084.00 MHz
- 3944.520 - GraduS with Pentium 3 1.4Ghz @ 1892.00 MHz
- 4067.180 - sparkY1000 with Pentium 3 Celeron 1.2Ghz @ 1947.30 MHz
- 4068.270 - kwaz2 with Pentium 3 1.266Ghz @ 1626.00 MHz
- 4111.892 - Turrican with Pentium 3 1.133Ghz (256KB L2 Cache) @ 1724.00 MHz
- 4113.210 - sparkY1000 with Pentium 3 1.4Ghz @ 1680.00 MHz
- 4120.535 - Turrican with Pentium 3 Celeron 1.2Ghz @ 1804.00 MHz
- 4123.050 - GraduS with Pentium 3 Celeron 1.1A Ghz Tualatin @ 1829.00 MHz
- 4209.323 - kwaz2 with Pentium 3 1.133Ghz (512KB L2 Cache) @ 1475.70 MHz
- 4268.808 - Turrican with Pentium 3 Celeron 1.0A Ghz Tualatin @ 1746.00 MHz
Stage 5: SOCKET 939
- 1125.156 - fredyama with Athlon 64 FX-57 @ 3893.80 MHz
- 1133.160 - Dani with Athlon 64 FX-57 @ 3893.00 MHz
- 1162.890 - Denny AKA guess2098 with Athlon 64 FX-57 @ 3840.00 MHz
- 1165.531 - TaPaKaH with Opteron 152 90nm @ 3705.00 MHz
- 1173.000 - knopflerbruce with Opteron 156 90nm @ 3803.10 MHz
- 1181.330 - Fixxxer with Athlon 64 FX-57 @ 3803.00 MHz
- 1181.840 - gocchin with Athlon 64 FX-57 @ 3791.00 MHz
- 1183.450 - gianni-gt with Athlon 64 4000+ San Diego @ 3750.00 MHz
- 1185.230 - s7e9h3n with Opteron 154 90nm @ 3750.80 MHz
- 1188.610 - gianni-gt with Athlon 64 3700+ San Diego @ 3688.00 MHz
hehe, i have for every socket a few plattforms ready, so no problem here.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba8f3/ba8f32e9d7d15274cb8b3ffde839b4cea373e9ea" alt=":D"
ooo, this like me, a bit oldschool CPUsdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc05d/cc05d7db0b1774627fcee09f4ba5b57d4bf6d8f6" alt=":)"
Got to buy some for good old socket 939.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba8f3/ba8f32e9d7d15274cb8b3ffde839b4cea373e9ea" alt=":D"
turrican wins this one -.-
My good old Clawhammer is ready...data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba8f3/ba8f32e9d7d15274cb8b3ffde839b4cea373e9ea" alt=":D"
Ahh, the competition wallpaper is really nice..data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc05d/cc05d7db0b1774627fcee09f4ba5b57d4bf6d8f6" alt=":)"
i don't have any of these motherboards or cpus...lol
have fun warriorsdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba8f3/ba8f32e9d7d15274cb8b3ffde839b4cea373e9ea" alt=":D"
Knopflerbruce will win this. Just look at his profile: AMD god.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/499c9/499c90378fa1aad6e2146c5b47a3bccb1766be82" alt=":o"
i would be not so sure. knut has good s939/754 results, but no socket 462/478/370 ones.
i think, to win you need to be good in every plattform. we'll see what everyone will bring out.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc05d/cc05d7db0b1774627fcee09f4ba5b57d4bf6d8f6" alt=":)"
i don't think i'll win, because there are too many crazy guys here as well.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba8f3/ba8f32e9d7d15274cb8b3ffde839b4cea373e9ea" alt=":D"
It's a team challenge. There's no individual victory possible ;-)
great, that's even better.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc05d/cc05d7db0b1774627fcee09f4ba5b57d4bf6d8f6" alt=":)"
...and I suck at 32m. Look at my efficiencies, they're completely shit. Not to mention the fact that I have problems installing Xp on my 939 rigs:D It just hangs where it says "setup is starting windows" or something, right before you get to choose the drive/partition:(
Nice challenge!
Count me in for socket 370 & 478
maybe and 462
http://h-2.abload.de/img/dsc04697kxoi.jpgdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba8f3/ba8f32e9d7d15274cb8b3ffde839b4cea373e9ea" alt=":D"
Gallatin CPUs are allowed for S478 too, right?
since it's s478, i think yesdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc05d/cc05d7db0b1774627fcee09f4ba5b57d4bf6d8f6" alt=":)"
Shit... Me thinking 4 CPUs was a lot. I'm little compared to you !data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba8f3/ba8f32e9d7d15274cb8b3ffde839b4cea373e9ea" alt=":D"
I must've missed something - whom were you talking about "a lot of CPUs", I don't see any large amounts on photos?data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba8f3/ba8f32e9d7d15274cb8b3ffde839b4cea373e9ea" alt=":D"
http://img441.imageshack.us/i/img0455y.jpg/
http://img713.imageshack.us/i/img0456yy.jpg/
maybe on friday i can make actual pics of my cpu collection as well.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5130/f5130597537b9c3801fbfb2bcede1a8e0d96f271" alt=":P"
Sam OCX, do you know which Gallatins had unlocked multi? I mean - the sSpecs. AFAIK, the retail ones didn't. And Northwoods as welldata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bddc0/bddc04f72d794ad0cc30e4dcd38c11e383025a22" alt=";)"
Anyway, I wish you luck. Why do you use Abit instead of Asus?
A lot of stage with a lot of rigs.. let's hunt begindata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba8f3/ba8f32e9d7d15274cb8b3ffde839b4cea373e9ea" alt=":D"
I have every one of these sockets but I rarely run 32M. Time to learn.
Nah, I can participate only in s.462 and s.939 categories. I have some good s.A CPUs, but I have no chance with air cooling, lol.
Otherwise I admit this competition, oldschool FTW
.
Edit:
Hi
please add AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Venice (s939) in competition
tnx
Should be fixed.
Thanks man,Is fixed
for the belgian teams: i have some S462 and S478 hardware available... Pushed a sempron to 3+ Ghz (actual 2.4 Ghz) and my PIV runs at 3.8 Ghz stock speed on air and pushed it to 4.16 Ghz on air.
Send my a pm for more info. (Athlon +1800, Sempron +2400, PIV 2.4 Ghz and PIV 3.2 Ghz and comp. mobo's, perhaps also a S754 available)
hi,
can you add a s370 CPU please : Intel Pentium III EB 1000Mhzdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba8f3/ba8f32e9d7d15274cb8b3ffde839b4cea373e9ea" alt=":D"
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1527071
it's already there;)
http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/pentium_3_1.0ghz_coppermine
oops, sorrydata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba8f3/ba8f32e9d7d15274cb8b3ffde839b4cea373e9ea" alt=":D"
first time you haven't the gold cup in CPU-Z
, never see it data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bddc0/bddc04f72d794ad0cc30e4dcd38c11e383025a22" alt=";)"
lol, i'm not everywhere first..data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bddc0/bddc04f72d794ad0cc30e4dcd38c11e383025a22" alt=";)"
Tough challenge. SPI 32M is brutal. Having much fun though. Many thanks to the staff.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc05d/cc05d7db0b1774627fcee09f4ba5b57d4bf6d8f6" alt=":)"
Indeed.
I think the hardest of the 5 is 370 and 754. 370 is a total crap shoot. just getting an os installed is a challenge. Im not sure how much actual tweaks go into this. it sounds like you just cross your fingers and wait for an hour and a half and hope for the best. maybe you had some copy waza tweaks in there. but total pain in the ass. not even socket holes to install a container. you need a c clamp. and to make matters worse half the boards dont have a locking agp/pci bus so thats another factor. then the ram. wtf? good luck on this stage. if you get your os installed you deserve a medal.
754 is the ultimate challenge. this is by far the hardest stage. if you win this stage you are hands down the KING OF OVERCLOCKING.
there is no platform tougher to oc than 754. this is the ultimate challenge of all the challenges in 2010 combined.
if you win this you are the best of the best.
939, 478, socket A are child's play compared these. Good luck guys. this is everyones dream contest who like me started ocing watching Charles, shamino, oppainter etc. it was just a handful of dudes and sub0 cooling was taboo. now we are all grown up now in the 21st century and have the opportunity to go back and do what we shouldve.
Huge thanks to Hwbot admins for making this one happen. these hdwr platforms are very special for so many reasons. the kids starting out on i3 have no idea how much work went into that tech and how amd64 pushed intel into what it is now. its so sad when you go back from 478/socket A and compare to 754 and 939 and legends like oscar wu and when ocz had eb and ddr booster and the psu powerstream 520w with the adjustable pots on it. that was invented for 754 to allow higher ram vdimm on 754. because the 1st 754 boards didnt have vdimm adjustments in bios that got into the danger zone. you had to do it by hand. I remember one page book and tony ocz pushed amd 64 to the limits. the k8n neo2 platinum... remember that thing? pain in the ass. when it actually worked it was awesome. it was the predecessor to the dfi lanparty nf3. Id like to see someone on a k8n neo2 platinum post a result.
sorry for the long post. this contest is so nostalgic to me and brings back so many great memories.
I posted this link so you guys have some inspiration while you bench.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjgpuib_8Kw
I hate s754. I'm going to bench it but yeah I hate it. Frustrating is putting it too mildly.
exactly. its the toughest because we all hate it. everyone loves a great barton bench on nf7s or a 478 bench on a prescott with a p4C-e dlx and bh5 or 939 on a ultra D and some tccd.
on 754 it doesnt seem to matter what skills you have. you could be the best ocer in the universe and have all the fancy hdwr and ram but get on 754 and all that doesnt mean crap. so much effort and very little reward. this is why 754 is the most hated.
I tried to bench it, but it doesn't boot anymore :-/.
What was AMD thinking anyways ... single channel LOL!
I am trying to do a vcore mod on my NF8 but no sucess yet.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/caac8/caac8c22aa80d679addca5981551be16579b4075" alt=":("
Pics of mod:
If VR stay over 6.5k ohms, OVP kicks and board disarm (without OVP, min voltage = 1.1v, max=2.0v), under 6.5k, vcore stay on 1.23v regardless of resistence of the VR...
Anyone has any idea what is wrong with this?data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffba1/ffba18e68a93ffca80c2c1ef1a0304088dc42f8d" alt=":S"
PS: I don't know if this is the best topic to ask this, if no, please any mod move this to a
better placedata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bddc0/bddc04f72d794ad0cc30e4dcd38c11e383025a22" alt=";)"
EDIT: Problem solved guys!
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?p=4669885&posted=1#post4669885
Now it is ready for action
:D:D
Anyone knows how to remove OVP (over voltage protection) on Asus P4Pxxx / P4Cxxx. My prescott always no post / beep when vcore set above 1.6vdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/caac8/caac8c22aa80d679addca5981551be16579b4075" alt=":("
It's OCP, not OVP. OVP wouldn't allow you to set higher Vcore with any CPU. And this one is CPU dependant. I'll check for one.
Anyone still has the TicTac biosmods for NF7-S rev2.0? It's hard too find a working download link for these...data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffba1/ffba18e68a93ffca80c2c1ef1a0304088dc42f8d" alt=":S"
Which one are you looking for?
D26 Black Mantaray CPC ON and CPC OFF versionsdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc05d/cc05d7db0b1774627fcee09f4ba5b57d4bf6d8f6" alt=":)"
Here you go.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bddc0/bddc04f72d794ad0cc30e4dcd38c11e383025a22" alt=";)"
Thanks Mr.Scott.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bddc0/bddc04f72d794ad0cc30e4dcd38c11e383025a22" alt=";)"
oh man I totally forgot about this. thanks guys for this. If i remember correctly cpc on was better for single sided dimms and cpc off was for double sided to get past 200. right? it was almost like setting 1t cmd and 2t. you can get higher with 2t (cpc off) and higher clocks but cpc on (1t) was better performance but couldnt clock as high. Oh man this brings back memories.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc05d/cc05d7db0b1774627fcee09f4ba5b57d4bf6d8f6" alt=":)"
this contest is bringing back so much nostalgia for me. i forgot all this stuff. its crazy. anyone fire up the ocz ddr booster yet?
It's not "like" 1T/2T - it is the exact thing. It's just another name for Command Rate.
man this was so many beers ago. thanks for the reply. I swear half the pain in the ass is just getting the os installed on these old boards. good luck guys. I'll try my best.
Log in or register to comment