Submission Details
Rankings and Points
World Record Rank
Not TAN YANG's Best SuperPi - 32M Submission
Intel
Core i7 920
Rank
43.5 Points
Global Team Power Rank
0.0 Points
Intel
Core i7 920
Team Power Rank
39.5 Points
Images
Hardware Details
Processor
Model Intel Core i7 920 Bloomfield Cooling Dry Ice
Temperature
Load -65.9 °C
Idle -67.0 °C
Cores
5,386.9 MHz
(+101.76%)
Videocard
Model NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 (GK208) (GK208) Cooling Air (Stock) Speed 967 MHz / 900 MHz (Stock)
Comments
Great score! but sorry man, you should use CPUZ 1.96 or newer
rules say even 2.00+
“HWBOT recognises that on LGA1156 and older hardware newer CPUZ versions can lead to wrong multiplier detection and even BSODs while just opening CPUZ. Therefore scores are allowed on these Legacy platforms (release date 2010 and older) with older CPUZ versions.”😁😉
“HWBOT recognises that on LGA1156 and older hardware newer CPUZ versions can lead to wrong multiplier detection and even BSODs while just opening CPUZ. Therefore scores are allowed on these Legacy platforms (release date 2010 and older) with older CPUZ versions.”😁😉
Therefore scores are allowed on these Legacy platforms with CPUZ version1.59 or CPUZ version 1.77
https://hwbot.org/faq
but honestly just comply with the rules for spi32m specifically. those i am sure are updated regularly as needed.
https://hwbot.org/benchmarks/superpi_-_32m/rules/5272
im sure you can redo your score 😉
Nice one, hopefully this chip will see LN2 some day
1.59 or 1.77 are fine, 2.00 and up are known to be troublesome for legacy HW.
i mean luumi is using 2.00 and he's got the sweet top scores. but the others are allowed so its ok
My basis is here: https://hwbot.org/generalRules - there's no restriction on CPU-Z versions👀. The original first-gen Core i7 logo looks better😚, don't you? Maybe I'll rebench it with LN2 this year. 🫠
It's very strange that we have two versions of the rules..."Spi32M rules" and "General rules"
its not strange. just not clearly defined atm. "older cpuz versions" doesnt mean much. 2.14 is also older than the current one. 1.59 or 1.77 sounds very clear to me and i dont know why the admin didnt copy that from the FAQ page over to the general rules to avoid such loopholes
Log in or register to comment