Submission Details

25 Jan 2012
elite League

Rankings and Points

World Record Rank
Global 2 Cores GPU Rank
2.0 Points
31.6 Points
Global 2 Cores GPU Team Power Rank
AMD  2x Radeon HD 7970  Team Power Rank
16.8 Points

Images

Hardware Details

Processor

Model Intel Core i7 3930K Sandy Bridge-E Cooling Water (Custom) Cores 5,100 MHz (+59.38%)

Memory

Product GeIL Evo Two Cooling Air (Stock) Type 8192 MB DDR3 SDRAM Speed @ 1,200 MHz Timings 7-11-7-27

Videocard

Model 2x AMD Radeon HD 7970 (Tahiti) Cooling Liquid Nitrogen Speed 1,450 MHz (+56.76%) / 1,800 MHz (+30.91%) buy on amazon

Motherboard

Model ASUS Rampage IV Extreme Cooling Air (Stock) Chipset X79

Disk

Capacity 64 GB (IDE) Series RealSSD C300 SSD (88SS9174 Controller)

Power Supply

n/a

Comments

Gyrock commented on his own score:
13 year and 6 months ago – ORB server down..
June 20, 2012 at 10:10:55 AM UTC

Just saw this. Gyrock-san..... how did you achieve this great score with such a low CPU clock? :) The scores around you have 400-600MHz!!! more CPU clock, but no difference in score.

June 20, 2012 at 10:52:26 AM UTC

Hi K404-san!

Thanks for your comment for such an old submission :)

As far as I know, 3DM11 requires GPU power much more than CPU one, so the impact of CPU clock is not big.

For the score range like this, even if you earn 1000 pts more from PT, you can only get 80 pts for total score..

The impact is so small that we would better take care of GPU temperature for the best efficiency from VGAs.

June 20, 2012 at 11:22:24 AM UTC

Sorry Gyrock-san, I disagree. I have a 3DMark11 calculator and if I use these examples, based on your 22615 score (I change one variable at a time):

 

Physics score - 1000. Total score = 22355 (-260pt)

Physics score + 1000. Total score = 22851 (+235pt)

 

GPU score - 1000. Total score = 22058 (-560pt)

GPU score + 1000. Total score = 23156 (+550pt)

 

Of course, adding 1000 to the CPU score is a bigger % increase than adding 1000 points to the GPU score.

 

.... but I do not understand how you matched the Physics test and Combined test scores of people running 500MHz higher than you. Good tweaking? (quite possible!! :D) Bug? (I hope not :()

June 20, 2012 at 1:04:15 PM UTC

Hi K404-san

 

You are right and I am wrong:P

I just misunderstood the figure, sorry for that.

 

Your calculation is correct, as my calculator says the same :D

Refer to attachment file.

 

The reason of good PT score is due to ver.1.0.1 whose PT score is higher than other versions.

It' no secret. Please read the thread below.

http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=32095

June 20, 2012 at 1:29:51 PM UTC

Ah! ok, 1.0.1. I could not tell the version used in any of the scores. I did not know the difference in Physics was so big between versions! Thanks for the explanation :D

 

My calculator is less pretty than yours!!

June 20, 2012 at 1:46:35 PM UTC

You are always welcome, K404-san :)

June 20, 2012 at 2:26:53 PM UTC

nice run gyrock, always pushing it. i wish i had time for benching but work is driving me crazy no time for benching :(

June 20, 2012 at 4:06:28 PM UTC

Thanks fester-san!!

I am sorry for hearing you have no time for benching...

My situation is almost the same as yours though...

June 20, 2012 at 7:33:39 PM UTC

killer eff as always Gyrock !

Im hunting down the trick of vantage cpu test, can u give me some hints about ?

how to get 1k 1.2k eff ? ( I mean for example 53,000 points of cpu score at 5200mhz or so )

Thank you in advance, and keep pushing !

June 20, 2012 at 10:26:28 PM UTC

Hi subaruwrc-san :)

There is no trick of Vantage CPU test, on X79 all you need to do is memory tweaking for better efficiency. That's the very different point compared to on X58.

Mem clock@1200MHz and timing like 9-11-9-27 or 8-11-8-27 would give you 1000 more points, I think.

Try this :)

June 21, 2012 at 12:48:46 AM UTC

^ True I have tested with same conclusion for moa Americas

 

Tight timings better than frequency :) and 1.0.1 version give boost without any changes.

 

2400 10-12-10 (GTX8 Hynix)

A15Of.jpg

 

1866 8-8-8 (dominator GT Hyper)

mmNUZ.png

 

700 points faster in physx (2.25FPS)

 

here is 5.0ghz 8-11-9 2400mhz for 17.2k

http://hwbot.org/submission/2281489_splave_3dmark11___performance_radeon_hd_7970_14925_marks

 

so tighter timings and 100mhz more cpu clock is totally achievable 17.6k

 

:)

Log in or register to comment