Calathea 29 Oct 2014, 11:41 UTC Oh wow, compare graphics score to mine, really weird how different the sub test are. http://hwbot.org/submission/2659034_calathea_3dmark11___performance_geforce_gtx_970_17698_marks/
Woomack 29 Oct 2014, 12:16 UTC On these cards results are weird after OC but we were already talking about it. On a weaker card I could make ~17700 even though core was 1595MHz while better card and exactly the same clocks give me ~200 points less.
I.nfraR.ed 29 Oct 2014, 14:11 UTC Well, my graphics score is even higher, but I have lower GT1 than yours and it is somehow comparable with Calathea's GT1 given the clocks used. Other GTs are higher. What does it depend on? Perhaps Win8? http://hwbot.org/submission/2647679_i.nfrar.ed_3dmark11___performance_geforce_gtx_970_17381_marks Of course my overall score is lower, due to the cpu .
Comments
Oh wow, compare graphics score to mine, really weird how different the sub test are. http://hwbot.org/submission/2659034_calathea_3dmark11___performance_geforce_gtx_970_17698_marks/
On these cards results are weird after OC but we were already talking about it. On a weaker card I could make ~17700 even though core was 1595MHz while better card and exactly the same clocks give me ~200 points less.
Well, my graphics score is even higher, but I have lower GT1 than yours and it is somehow comparable with Calathea's GT1 given the clocks used. Other GTs are higher. What does it depend on? Perhaps Win8? http://hwbot.org/submission/2647679_i.nfrar.ed_3dmark11___performance_geforce_gtx_970_17381_marks
Of course my overall score is lower, due to the cpu
.