Rankings and Points
World Record Rank
Not TerraRaptor's Best 3DMark2001 SE Submission
Global 1 Cores GPU Rank
ATi
Radeon 9200/9250 (AGP 8x, 128bit)
Rank
50.0 Points
Global 1 Cores GPU Team Power Rank
0.0 Points
ATi
Radeon 9200/9250 (AGP 8x, 128bit)
Team Power Rank
41.0 Points
Hardware Details
Processor
Model
Intel
Pentium E5800
Wolfdale-2M
Cooling
Air (Custom)
Cores
4,200 MHz
(+31.25%)
REF 200 MHz
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54a56/54a56fcb81fca0e1455b13998e90d3ff0ba50658" alt=""
Memory
n/a
Videocard
Model ATi Radeon 9200/9250 (AGP 8x, 128bit) (RV280) Cooling Single Stage Phase Change Speed 439 MHz (+82.92%) / 257 MHz (+28.50%)data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54a56/54a56fcb81fca0e1455b13998e90d3ff0ba50658" alt="buy on amazon"
Comments
Still haven't learned how to take the right screenshots? Or we cheat a little, using non-standard settings.
Rules - https://hwbot.org/rules?referenceId=5186 In ideal conditions, you can also open the settings with the test details.
Can't see what's wrong - cpu and display settings visible,.subtest fps also there. Explain please?)
better now?
You real understood rules? Then I wonder how you got rid of the artifacts at higher frequencies?
I do. So what is exactly wrong?
You should make vpdd mod (according to MS-8952 schematic - r9250 from MSI - RV280 has a dedicated power circuit for core transform (vdd_ct) and core pll (vpdd) units in gpu. Stock is 1.8v. Raising it up helps to fight artefacts and memory instability. Maximum benchable voltage for vpdd for me was 2.15v, 2.17-2.2v makes freezes in 2D sometimes, 2.25v ends with black screen all the time. My Palit card also had that voltage source, based on L1117, stock was 1.88v.
Me too. Options field covered by cpu-z doesn't contain ANY settings affecting score (they are - demo looping, demo sounds, game detail level that defaults on low). The only option that is said to affect score (disable title screens between tests) isn't exposed on 3dmark main window. So it is completely safe to say that screensot was fine.
Edit: okay, sorry. Antinomy says that if non-default settings were used (z-buffer depth) 3dmark will notify on that below the total score "non-standard settings were used". Putting cpuz window just below the score could cover that text. Had no idea of that, never touched display settings.
I see 1 of 7 game tests selected here, installed Omera for advantage.
Just because its f*cking hard to find old ATI drivers. No extra advantage from Omega once you have ATT or other tweaker.
ATT does the same thing. As for 1 out of 7 selected, it's because you rerun car low to get the best possible one
Nice one @TerraRaptor well done bro
LOL ?
@klopcha
How are you to say legendary TerraRaptor to say he is a cheater? What wrong with you?
It's in the human nature to explain things you don't understand with something else - aliens, god, cheaters, etc.
I remember a long time ago when klopcha was an overclocker and a good one. I wonder if we see this ever again.
Log in or register to comment