SteveRo December 10, 2013, 2:29:31 PM GMT I don't understand your comment, this run was with four SSDs.
Don_Dan December 10, 2013, 6:45:07 PM GMT NATA 58, this is the second time you complain about one of Steve's results, but what do you mean?
Vinster December 15, 2013, 3:57:47 PM GMT On the records page this result is listed as the world record for all rankings 1x disk, 2x disk, 3x disk, 4x disk, etc.
parsec January 21, 2014, 3:50:09 AM GMT A completely legal, valid, and honest result, four SSDs in RAID 0 clearly stated. A far more impressive result than using RAM caching (RAPID, etc) with a SSD and claiming it is a SSD benchmark.
scracy February 21, 2014, 6:20:59 AM GMT Nice to see an HONEST result....most are using RAM Cache....clearly this is NOT,nice score!
Comments
record invalid NATA 58 i used 4 ssd
I don't understand your comment, this run was with four SSDs.
NATA 58, this is the second time you complain about one of Steve's results, but what do you mean?
Lol, why invalid
He use Areca, you cant score this onboard 
On the records page this result is listed as the world record for all rankings 1x disk, 2x disk, 3x disk, 4x disk, etc.
A completely legal, valid, and honest result, four SSDs in RAID 0 clearly stated.
A far more impressive result than using RAM caching (RAPID, etc) with a SSD and claiming it is a SSD benchmark.
Nice to see an HONEST result....most are using RAM Cache....clearly this is NOT,nice score!
Log in or register to comment.