Don_Dan 10 Dec 2013, 18:45 UTC NATA 58, this is the second time you complain about one of Steve's results, but what do you mean?
Vinster 15 Dec 2013, 15:57 UTC On the records page this result is listed as the world record for all rankings 1x disk, 2x disk, 3x disk, 4x disk, etc.
parsec 21 Jan 2014, 03:50 UTC A completely legal, valid, and honest result, four SSDs in RAID 0 clearly stated. A far more impressive result than using RAM caching (RAPID, etc) with a SSD and claiming it is a SSD benchmark.
scracy 21 Feb 2014, 06:20 UTC Nice to see an HONEST result....most are using RAM Cache....clearly this is NOT,nice score!
Comments
record invalid NATA 58 i used 4 ssd
I don't understand your comment, this run was with four SSDs.
NATA 58, this is the second time you complain about one of Steve's results, but what do you mean?
Lol, why invalid
He use Areca, you cant score this onboard 
On the records page this result is listed as the world record for all rankings 1x disk, 2x disk, 3x disk, 4x disk, etc.
A completely legal, valid, and honest result, four SSDs in RAID 0 clearly stated.
A far more impressive result than using RAM caching (RAPID, etc) with a SSD and claiming it is a SSD benchmark.
Nice to see an HONEST result....most are using RAM Cache....clearly this is NOT,nice score!
Log in or register to comment.