LN2 on a poor laptop on a cheap as can get setup, cutom pll driver thanks to an esp32, water cooled chipset cuz those needed some voltage too, sadly, could only do one score before it died, but reach a frequency i never thought possible after almost killing it. (had hard time booting it at all, so decided to pour until the can was filled to the brim, torched it for a min and it decided to go, then cranked voltage to a "i just wanted to kill this chip" 2.37v, and the thing took it, so upped pll until it froze, backed off a few, and this what we got, a valid and completed run of the dang unforgivable cinebench r11.5. got this thing to crash system thought stable, so its a win for me even with a sad score. my personal guess is a cold bug of some sort, maybe induce by condensation(didnt protect any, the laptop was literally bowed when done, and was to be expected tbh) , by my guess is the actual frequency being closer to 6,227.21 ( and would make sens with the multipliers time bus freq that were input) my guess is it calculated it double for the sake of a not so happy electron somewhere in the silicon ;-) on this , the witch is out for the nyte ^^
Comments
LN2 on a poor laptop on a cheap as can get setup, cutom pll driver thanks to an esp32, water cooled chipset cuz those needed some voltage too, sadly, could only do one score before it died, but reach a frequency i never thought possible after almost killing it. (had hard time booting it at all, so decided to pour until the can was filled to the brim, torched it for a min and it decided to go, then cranked voltage to a "i just wanted to kill this chip" 2.37v, and the thing took it, so upped pll until it froze, backed off a few, and this what we got, a valid and completed run of the dang unforgivable cinebench r11.5. got this thing to crash system thought stable, so its a win for me even with a sad score. my personal guess is a cold bug of some sort, maybe induce by condensation(didnt protect any, the laptop was literally bowed when done, and was to be expected tbh) , by my guess is the actual frequency being closer to 6,227.21 ( and would make sens with the multipliers time bus freq that were input) my guess is it calculated it double for the sake of a not so happy electron somewhere in the silicon ;-) on this , the witch is out for the nyte ^^
I'm going to make it worse by saying the score is invalid because there's no CPU-Z windows :(
Log in or register to comment