Submission Details
GPUPI - 1B
Score
0 sec 978 ms
with
Enthusiast
Submitted
Rankings and Points
- World Record Rank
- Not ADVenturePO's Best WR Submission
- 4 Cores Global Rank
- 4 Cores GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Rank
- 4 Cores Team Power Rank
- 4 Cores GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Team Power Rank
Images
Hardware Details
Processor
- Model
- Core i9 7960X Skylake-X
- Cooling
- Water (Custom)
- Cores
- 4,399.85 MHz (57%)
Videocard
- Model
- 4x GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (TU102) (GeForce 2000 Series)
- Cooling
- Water (Custom)
- Speed
- 2,100.00 MHz (55%) / 7,599.00 MHz (334%)
Motherboard
- Model
- WS X299 SAGE/10G
- Cooling
- Air (Stock)
- Chipset
- X299
Disk
- Type
- SSD
- Series
- 960 EVO (AHCI Controller)
Comments
Dear @avalanche
Please, get some knowledge... from Google maybe?
https://hwbot.org/submission/3786224_h2o_vs_ln2_gpupi___1b_4x_titan_v_0sec_991ms/ - 2 times more pricey cards and chiller.
https://hwbot.org/submission/3769407_kingpin_gpupi___1b_4x_titan_v_0sec_996ms/ - 2 times more pricey cards and Liquid Nitrogen
Please compare specs.
I wrote you how many different timings and CPU speeds I have tested to get best workflow with those cards.
Render Config
Theoretical Performance
Also: be aware, that in Octane, Vray and Redshift for a single card records are mine and done with Titan V.
FE: Octane : 467 pts with Titan V vs 367 with RTX 2080 TI.
Judging by the price and specs Titan V is better. But I never had 4x Titan V with LC at once.
Cheers.
Nice one, about time the Titan V is pwnd!
What's going on with the hardware shaming here?
@_mat_ Avalanche has problems, and he is all time trying to prove that i'm just a shitty overclocker.
The explanation above was to show that I haven't had pure value and performance advantage.
The argue started under discussion about multi cards scores. Thread is closed. He just wanted to pin me elsewhere.
Cheers ?
Log in or register to comment.