Nice score, very well done! Less efficient due to the smaller Cache I guess?!
Woah! How did I miss this! Much congrats - looks like you got a good one!
yes it seems 2mb less cache = 20 mhz lost effeciency give or take.
Great run man.
I'd say it's much more than 20 MHz, you're just so damn fast
Log in or register to comment
Comments
Nice score, very well done! Less efficient due to the smaller Cache I guess?!
Woah! How did I miss this! Much congrats - looks like you got a good one!
yes it seems 2mb less cache = 20 mhz lost effeciency give or take.
Great run man.
I'd say it's much more than 20 MHz, you're just so damn fast
Log in or register to comment