Submission Details

10 min 31 sec 657 ms with Phenom II X4 965 BE @ 6748.7 MHz

Rankings and Points

World Record Rank
Not BeepBeep2's Best SuperPi - 32M Submission
AMD  Phenom II X4 965 BE  Rank
46.0 Points
Global Team Power Rank

Images

Hardware Details

Processor

Model AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE Deneb (4 Cores Active) Cooling Liquid Nitrogen Cores 6,748.7 MHz (+98.49%)

Memory

Product Super Talent Project X Cooling Air (Stock) Type 4096 MB DDR3 SDRAM Speed @ 915 MHz Timings 6-6-5-17 1T

Videocard

Model AMD Radeon HD 5770 (Juniper) Cooling Air (Stock) Speed 850 MHz / 1,200 MHz (Stock) buy on amazon

Motherboard

Model ASUS ROG Crosshair V Formula Cooling Air (Stock) Chipset 990FX

Disk

n/a

Power Supply

n/a

Comments

BeepBeep2 commented on his own score:
12 years ago – Kind of angry, Board is extremely slow. 4-5 runs failed at or after loop 19, one failed at 23, was on track for 10:29.xxx. CPU is good for 6800 32M unless I degraded it too much.
June 27, 2012 at 6:27:33 AM UTC

Max CPU-NB possible, I tried to run 6.78/4.6/915 6-6-6-18 with CWL = 6 (2sec faster, but needs much higher vdimm) but this run was with CWL = 7.

 

Infra, the runs after this had me on my toes because I had you beat, but the rig didn't want to have it. -_-

June 27, 2012 at 10:51:38 AM UTC

Wow, so close. The cpu is great, but c5f is inefficient board, you're loosing around 7-8sec I think. Maybe more.

June 27, 2012 at 5:30:41 PM UTC

Lmao. I had one like this with K8 a couple of years ago. In the lead even after 24th loop finished, but lost by 0.1s in the end... to massman I think it was :P

 

You're still more lucky than me with C5F - my board has cold boot bug at -90, and seems to coldbug at like -180c.

 

No gain my lowering TRC? I can run 11... as tight as it goes.

June 27, 2012 at 6:10:47 PM UTC

Look at my best Deneb runs. It's not because I can't run trc=11 :P

 

Oh..and btw I still don't know how to master the final loop. Usually lose some time there when I'm far ahead after the 24th loop.

 

Beep, if you compare our scores, you're only faster at the first 2 loops, due to pure speed.

But..my final loop is bad.

 

Looking at Calathea's score, I'm 1 sec faster than him until the last loop, but at the end our times are very close. That's why I was disappointed, because I had a proper run, but lost it - 10:29.xxx.

June 27, 2012 at 9:06:59 PM UTC

Yeah, that is interesting. I was 1 second faster than you in the last loop. As far as TRC, I always thought it was most efficient to run CL + TRAS, chew* told me that TRC = 11 was slower but could allow higher clocks with some DDR3.

 

I'm not sure what is up with TRC = 15, must be faster? Not sure.

 

I know on K8 + NF590, I found that TRC = between 13-15 was fastest no matter what primary timings you used.

June 27, 2012 at 10:03:09 PM UTC

Yes. Don't remember if I've tested all values between 11 and 24, but probably most of them and 15 was fastest for me. Since then, I always run trc=15.

Even at 940 with the gtx2, doesn't hurt my clocks.

June 27, 2012 at 10:12:57 PM UTC

What mattered to me the most was CAS Write latency though, default is 8 I think but 6/7 are just so much faster, can improve time by 3-4 seconds even.

When I get back from vacation in mid July I'll have more time to test, but having only 30L on hand at a time is a little inconvenient, goes fast when things aren't going as planned.

July 2, 2012 at 10:59:45 AM UTC

good job :D

Log in or register to comment