Schnitzel_12000 29 Jun 2012, 13:18 UTC I tried both and there is a difference from 2 seconds. And that can be also the difference between two runs with the same settings.
I.nfraR.ed 29 Jun 2012, 14:56 UTC wazza/cdt gives me only 2sec here. Your time is not that bad, 30sec slower than my run on 2706MHz, but I have higher fsb/ram and maybe tighter subtimings. You can try 244x11 if your ram and board allows you.
Schnitzel_12000 29 Jun 2012, 20:52 UTC 11x244 is not possible for 32m and yes, I tweaked all I can. Waza also gives me nothing, I must get 2 mhz fsb lower to come trough . Im sad, if I tried out I hit 238 easyly wit three different CPU's, at the moment something closed at 230 and I don't now what. I will try a little bit tomorrow, pehaps i'll have a little surprise.
Comments
Powerd by Ghettochiller 2.0
Very nice my Friend;)
Thanks.
I do my very best but it seems it's not enough.
Try higher Tras - it may be faster on nf2u.
I tried both and there is a difference from 2 seconds.
And that can be also the difference between two runs with the same settings.
have you applied all well known OS tweaks like wazza, LSC etc?
wazza/cdt gives me only 2sec here. Your time is not that bad, 30sec slower than my run on 2706MHz, but I have higher fsb/ram and maybe tighter subtimings.
You can try 244x11 if your ram and board allows you.
11x244 is not possible for 32m and yes, I tweaked all I can.
Waza also gives me nothing, I must get 2 mhz fsb lower to come trough .
Im sad, if I tried out I hit 238 easyly wit three different CPU's, at the moment something closed at 230 and I don't now what.
I will try a little bit tomorrow, pehaps i'll have a little surprise.
Log in or register to comment.