websmile 15 Feb 2016, 21:02 UTC So much work and I had same result at 5 minutes function test on impact without mem tweaking so sad
BenchBros 15 Feb 2016, 21:23 UTC Yes... Haha... It was not that much work. Even 102,68 was stable, but I got no score. Maybe not stable enough Really need to test Impact or 4 DIMM! At least I have full detail screen, so I get tons of advices for RAM tweaking... LOL!
rtsurfer 16 Feb 2016, 00:04 UTC Try 1 RAM multi lower. RTLs are 1 better there & score stays the same (atleast for me, on Impact). Also you'll get more RAM stability, allowing you to go till 102.7 BCLK. I think 739 should be doable with 2 DIMMs.
Comments
Crazy rams and great job Andi!
So much work and I had same result at 5 minutes function test on impact without mem tweaking
so sad 
Yes... Haha... It was not that much work. Even 102,68 was stable, but I got no score. Maybe not stable enough
Really need to test Impact or 4 DIMM!
At least I have full detail screen, so I get tons of advices for RAM tweaking... LOL!
P:S. Ram timings are not that bad, tweaked nicely
Try 1 RAM multi lower. RTLs are 1 better there & score stays the same (atleast for me, on Impact). Also you'll get more RAM stability, allowing you to go till 102.7 BCLK.
I think 739 should be doable with 2 DIMMs.
Log in or register to comment.