ZFeSS 31 Mar 2016, 13:09 UTC Asus Ti4200 3.3ns mem. Water temp +6C. Chipset waterblock from RE on GPU. vGPU 1.92v, vMem 3.05v. vDD mod, vMem mod, 3.3v PSU rail mod - useless. CPU is capable for 2810 but not this time.
lanbonden 31 Mar 2016, 13:57 UTC great score on water! How come you use tras 11 instead of 5 as stock?
ZFeSS 31 Mar 2016, 14:12 UTC Thanks. Looks like 19k was possible, too bad that I didn't recheck boost from raising agp clocks. AFAIK tras 11 is faster than any other, tested by many other people before. Didn't checked it in this case really.
I.nfraR.ed 31 Mar 2016, 16:31 UTC 11 was/is considered faster and more stable, but I think it had been related to something specific to bioses/chipset revisions back then. To me 5 is faster on my boards and bioses I use (self-modded latest offcial bioses for my boards). For me 5 > 7 > 9 > 11, exactly how it should be. BTW, nice score! I should have played safe and just use the chiller.
Comments
Asus Ti4200 3.3ns mem. Water temp +6C. Chipset waterblock from RE on GPU. vGPU 1.92v, vMem 3.05v.
vDD mod, vMem mod, 3.3v PSU rail mod - useless.
CPU is capable for 2810 but not this time.
great score on water! How come you use tras 11 instead of 5 as stock?
Thanks. Looks like 19k was possible, too bad that I didn't recheck boost from raising agp clocks.
AFAIK tras 11 is faster than any other, tested by many other people before. Didn't checked it in this case really.
11 was/is considered faster and more stable, but I think it had been related to something specific to bioses/chipset revisions back then.
To me 5 is faster on my boards and bioses I use (self-modded latest offcial bioses for my boards).
For me 5 > 7 > 9 > 11, exactly how it should be.
BTW, nice score! I should have played safe and just use the chiller.
Log in or register to comment.