Official HWBOT Partner
Official HWBOT Partner

Submission Details

549900 marks with
GFX - 121758
CPU - 50101
Chapter 1 - 629.11
Chapter 2 - 510.49
Chapter 3 - 514.24
Chapter 4 - 586.39
Chapter 5 - 551.28
Chapter 6 - 597.76
Chapter 7 - 607.84
Chapter 8 - 516.32
Chapter 9 - 457.77
Extreme Submitted

Images

Hardware Details

Processor

Model
Core i7 3770K Ivy Bridge
Cooling
Liquid Nitrogen
Cores
3,718.20 MHz  (6%)

Memory

Product
Dominator
Cooling
Air (Custom)
Type
4 GB  DDR3 SDRAM Speed @ 1,306 MHz
Timings
tCAS: 8.0  tRCD: 12  tRP: 8  tRAS: 30
Batch
PSC

Videocard

Model
GeForce GTX 780 (GK110') (GeForce 700 series)
Series
DirectCU II TOP
Cooling
Air (Stock)
Speed
863.00 MHz  /  1,502.00 MHz
Batch
AOOC

Motherboard

Cooling
Air (Custom)
Chipset
Z77

Power Supply

Power
800 Watt

Comments

TerraRaptor commented on own score:
actual cpu multi is x61 - lowered it for validation
John_White
John_White

Very impressive, you need a haswell@ 6.36.4 as least

Strat
Strat

How is this possible... All that stuff with aquamark wrapper is a big mess. The point in benchmarking is to be able to compare score right? But with each new wrapper rev, score increases. :( :( :(

 

Anyway good benching Terraraptor.

RULE
RULE

nice run man.

you haven't trouble with wrapper failed to open the result window?

with my gtx 780 is impossible close correctly this bench.

TerraRaptor
TerraRaptor

check my efficiency with 5ghz run yesterday - I can do the same with standalone am3. Wrapper just adds some bad runs - not good ones.

TerraRaptor
TerraRaptor

@ RULE - no, I had another bug today - I need to open new instance of wrapper for every run to save the score - if I run second time it gives result window, opens cpuz/gpuz, offers the folder to save - but after me choosing the name of save file and pressing save - nothing actually saves.

_12_
_12_

Very, very strong bro!

Strat
Strat
check my efficiency with 5ghz run yesterday - I can do the same with standalone am3. Wrapper just adds some bad runs - not good ones.

 

Genebien himself noticed an improvment of 16k from 2.25v to 2.26v...

Moose83
Moose83

Thats right, actually wrapper has same performance like running it without wrapper ;) Genieben has done good work, only some bad runs appear sometimes lol :D