CAL930 November 4, 2010, 3:50:29 PM GMT Hi Massman-san! Thanks a lot for your comment The retail i5 655K has a lot of such chips I proved it! This lotnamber is L006B895
steponz November 4, 2010, 5:01:41 PM GMT Killer result I had the same score, but the cpuz was corrupt.. ... I need to try in a Classy board... Thats just sick... way to go...
steponz November 4, 2010, 5:01:49 PM GMT Killer result I had the same score, but the cpuz was corrupt.. ... I need to try in a Classy board... Thats just sick... way to go...
CAL930 November 5, 2010, 6:43:55 AM GMT Hi steponz-san Thanks a lot for your comment! A result good for you, too!
CAL930 November 8, 2010, 4:13:15 AM GMT Hi Dan Jacques-san! Thanks a lot for your comment! It was 2.011V by CPU-Z indication, but it was 2.02V by measurement:D
CAL930 November 8, 2010, 4:17:56 AM GMT Hi nasty candy-san! Thanks a lot for your comment! Four pieces were OK 2.0V among five 655K which I tried
Comments
Crazy!
Hi Massman-san!
Thanks a lot for your comment
The retail i5 655K has a lot of such chips
I proved it!
This lotnamber is L006B895
awesome result cal-san
Hi HW-King!
Thanks a lot for your comment!
Killer result I had the same score, but the cpuz was corrupt..
... I need to try in a Classy board... Thats just sick... way to go... 
Killer result I had the same score, but the cpuz was corrupt..
... I need to try in a Classy board... Thats just sick... way to go... 
R E S P E C T
Hi steponz-san Thanks a lot for your comment!
A result good for you, too!
Hi leeghoofd-san! Thanks a lot for your comment!
very nice work there man , congrats!
Hi Predator-san! Thanks a lot for your comment!
Fantastic work, Cal-san! Congrats!
(ps: 2.011V OMG)
nice one!
Hi Dan Jacques-san! Thanks a lot for your comment!
It was 2.011V by CPU-Z indication, but it was 2.02V by measurement:D
Hi nasty candy-san! Thanks a lot for your comment!
Four pieces were OK 2.0V among five 655K which I tried
fantastic result...
thanks for sharing lot number..
Log in or register to comment.