reported by user due to possible cheat (Face OC and rejected validation from CPU-Z)
Rasparthe
At that time, CPUz was rejecting the validations since it wasn't reporting ref clock correct. The ref clock is simply doubled but freq is correct. 344 ref x 27 is not 4644 freq.
Rasparthe
You can see other examples of this in A75M-UD2H ref clock rankings...http://hwbot.org/submission/2246308_soulman84_reference_clock_ga_a75m_ud2h_174_mhzMy ranking in the ref clock is where I hit this valid
Christian Ney
moderator changed status from 'reported by user due to possible cheat' to 'checked by a moderator' - reason: check
Comments
Log in or register to comment.