Rankings and Points
World Record Rank
Not knopflerbruce's Best CPU Frequency Submission
AMD
Athlon 64 FX-55 (San Diego)
Rank
20.0 Points
Global Team Power Rank
0.0 Points
AMD
Athlon 64 FX-55 (San Diego)
Team Power Rank
4.0 Points
Hardware Details
Processor
Model AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 (San Diego) San Diego Cooling Liquid Nitrogen Cores 3,991.53 MHz (+53.52%)data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54a56/54a56fcb81fca0e1455b13998e90d3ff0ba50658" alt=""
Comments
FX-57data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5130/f5130597537b9c3801fbfb2bcede1a8e0d96f271" alt=":P"
Yes, but it's not. Some guy at XS had one like this, says FX55 on the IHS and boots 2.6GHz stock, but reads FX57 in CPUZ.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?64370-Fx&p=889817&viewfull=1#post889817
I can post a picture of the CPu if I have to:D
Aha, got it. But you still need to change the frequency, it's higher than stateddata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5130/f5130597537b9c3801fbfb2bcede1a8e0d96f271" alt=":P"
No, there is an issue with CPUz - sometimes you overwrite an older validation if you upload a few cvf files within a short time period. I was semi-aware of the issue, so I took a screenshot of the original validation - which is the FX55 one. The one that's actually displayed is the FX57 I had a long time ago.
Ok, you win!data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba8f3/ba8f32e9d7d15274cb8b3ffde839b4cea373e9ea" alt=":D"
Log in or register to comment