manual online submission

modified by owner

modified by owner

modified by owner

modified by owner

reported by user due to lack of validation (Memory Latency is bugged, last year i submit 65 Memory Latency and Pro says its bugged and deleted my score. So where is fair moderating this benchmark, one person allowed, and others are not :()

reported by user due to lack of validation (Memory Latency is bugged, last year i submit 65 Memory Latency and Pro says its bugged and deleted my score. So where is fair moderating this benchmark, one person allowed, and others are not :()

reported by user due to lack of validation (Memory Latency is bugged, last year i submit 65 Memory Latency and Pro says its bugged and deleted my score. So where is fair moderating this benchmark, one person allowed, and others are not:()

reported by user due to lack of validation (Gpu on x16 isnt possible with controller on MV Gene ;))

It's possible: http://rog.asus.com/86132012/maximus-motherboards/preview-maximus-v-gene/

So , what's wrong with this score ?The PCIEX speed is correct , as the Areca controller is plugged in the black slot that is controller by the PCH . Only the VGA is in the GPU PCIEx slot . That's why it's at 16X

moderator changed status from 'reported by user due to lack of validation' to 'checked by a moderator' - reason: This score has been in the list for way too long. Checked.