Official HWBOT Partner
Official HWBOT Partner

Submission Details

Extreme Submitted

Rankings and Points

1 Core Radeon RX Vega 64  Team Power Rank
2nd  9.5 Points

Images

Hardware Details

Processor

Model
Core i9 9900X Skylake-X
Cooling
Water (Custom)
Temperature
Load 77 °C Idle 23 °C Ambient 19 °C
Cores
5,200.00 MHz  (48%)

Memory

Product
G.Skill Trident Z RGB
Cooling
Air (Stock)
Type
32 GB  G.Skill  DDR4 SDRAM Speed @ 4,200 MHz
Timings
tCAS: 15.0  tRCD: 16  tRP: 15  tRAS: 28

Videocard

Model
Radeon RX Vega 64 (Vega 10) (GCN 5th Generation (Vega))
Series
Nitro
Cooling
Water (Custom)
Temperature
Load 32 °C Idle 24 °C Ambient 24 °C
Speed
1,750.00 MHz  (40%)  /  1,110.00 MHz  (17%)

Motherboard

Cooling
Air (Stock)
Chipset
X299

Disk

Type
HDD
Series
WD Black (AHCI Controller)

Power Supply

Series
Platinum
Power
1000 Watt

Comments

Xtremefunky commented on own score:
Thanks to Nwalm for reporting my scores. Now I turned up my Vega even higher and this is the result. Every action, will have a reaction my friend :) No P1 for You. Dont try it either. I undervolted my card by 50mV for this run. Could clock higher, but seems enough for you.
Nwalm
Nwalm
I didnt report your superposition score, i am fine with them, i even liked your previous 8K top score (would be even more fine with it you could post the non croped screenshot for the 1080p result). My card is not modded and its a regular (non liquid) Vega, so i am stuck with 1.2v i know i wont compet with liquid version and modded card and i am fine with this. That being said i reported both your timespy score because both are invalids (and i had timespy scores reported and removed for this same reason). Timespy should be run with tesselation on and be a validated result. And by the way i dont have the cpu to compete for P1 on timespy anyway, 6 cores are not enough for this bench. Remember its for fun ;)
Xtremefunky
Xtremefunky
Yes, but if You look after my current validated TimeSpy Scores and the reported ones, You can see its nearly the same score. The run wasnt invalid because of driver mods, it was invalid, because this retarded sysinfo wasnt able to read out my specs. So the score it self was 100% proper. Anyway, now they are 100% correct for HWBot and i spent around 1 hour to get this crap sysinfo to run fine on my system. But yes, You are right. Its for fun and I havent had such fun like today for a while. Usually I have a R VII and the Vega lays behind, but for today i swaped it, updated drivers, get sysinfo to run, benched the card to the limits in 3Dmark benches (1,29V). Yes, it was truely fun and exiting today. You have a nice card anyway. If You turn up the voltage, it could be a interessting battle, I think :)
Nwalm
Nwalm
Actually its what i said in the report form. A link to the 3dmark result allow to know why its invalid without having to report it (i would not report for an invalid driver or sysinfo shenanigans), but an invalid result without validation link could have been run with tesselation off. Congrat for the new entries anyway ;) My card is an old miner (was sold has dead, got it for 90€), it actually work fine. I just try to do the best i can with what i get, i dont invest money for this and i need this system ^^ So if i try to hardmod thats going to be when Vega is cheap enough to experiment on it and when i dont need the card on my main pc anymore. So not anytime soon!
Xtremefunky
Xtremefunky
I modded my Vegas just after they were released :D And... broke 2 of them. The problem on Vega cards is not the Voltage. The problem is the huge powerdraw. The Chip is self can handle 1,34V+ without any problem. But the powerstages get most likely killed. At 1,34V the Vega chip consumes around 700-800W, which is crazyyyy. So.. keep an Eye on the Wattmeter, if You voltage mod the card and dont get over 600W for short time runs. This would be my suggestion :D ;)