Not bad. New bios/agesa actually seems faster than 2505 when tuned.

2 hours ago, I.nfraR.ed said:

Not bad. New bios/agesa actually seems faster than 2505 when tuned.

But I had lots of issues on LN2 with this bios, main one is that instead of the usual CBB behavior of C5 or whatever, the board just didn’t react to start button. Then also just that high memory clock on ln2 was way less stable and I could only run -88. Lastly, this cpu did -180 to -190 before and now it freezes at -110. Also got socket replaced on it since then but I need to test old bios again.

Main purpose of this anyway though was to compare ambient to ln2 frequency to gauge what my ambient goal needs to be

Oh, good to know as I plan to test LN2 soon. By old bios, do you mean 2505? Maybe I'll go back to 2505 to recheck if I can run the same settings and compare.

16 minutes ago, I.nfraR.ed said:

Oh, good to know as I plan to test LN2 soon. By old bios, do you mean 2505? Maybe I'll go back to 2505 to recheck if I can run the same settings and compare.

Yeah 2505, I would start on 2702 and if you have bad CB and can’t solve, try 2505 before giving up.