Official HWBOT Partner

Submission Details

62149 marks with
Radeon HD 3850 AGP @ 958.00/1161 MHz
Elite checked by a moderator Submitted

Rankings and Points

Images

Hardware Details

Processor

Cooling
Water (Custom)
Cores
4,250.00 MHz  (32%)
Batch
1001APMW

Memory

Cooling
Air (Custom)
Type
2 GB  DDR2 SDRAM Speed @ 443 MHz
Batch
D9GKX

Videocard

Model
Radeon HD 3850 AGP (RV670) (ATI Radeon HD 3000 series)
Cooling
Air (Custom)
Speed
958.00 MHz  (42%)  /  1,161.00 MHz  (39%)

Motherboard

Cooling
Air (Stock)

Comments

I.nfraR.ed commented on own score:
Old Phenom II X4 955 C3
I.nfraR.ed
I.nfraR.ed

Ok, this result got reported. Wrote a comment in the mod tools section, but I'm not sure if it's saved there.

So, I'm writing it here, too

 

1. Popup with the score says 62149 - exactly the same as the details/subtests window. The main application shows 58731 and that's because I've reran Car Low several times after the first score. Most probably I've reran other test(s) too, but there's no way I can remember now.

2. I don't know how the score is calculated (will check the datasheet), but there might be a bug? However I'm definitely not a cheater and never tried to be.

 

GENiEBEN
GENiEBEN
2. I don't know how the score is calculated (will check the datasheet), but there might be a bug? However I'm definitely not a cheater and never tried to be.

 

validation_2001_infrared.png

Don_Dan
Don_Dan
2. I don't know how the score is calculated (will check the datasheet), but there might be a bug? However I'm definitely not a cheater and never tried to be.

 

01 is easy, all high tests and Nature x 20 + all low tests x 10. Or you can use a fancy program like the one above! :D

 

 

Edit: I am slow. :(

I.nfraR.ed
I.nfraR.ed

Yeah, I found the formula. I don't know it by heart, although it's easy and i think will always remember it from now on...

tiborrr
tiborrr

Sorry, i reported it, my bad, I didn't know 3DMark doesn't properly sum up subtest scores. I apologize for the inconvenience.

 

But re-run of CL cannot gain 4000 pts, that's 400 FPS :)

GENiEBEN
GENiEBEN
But re-run of CL cannot gain 4000 pts, that's 400 FPS :)

 

That is true, but the old score in the main window does not get updated until you close the Score Window. So you can run with lower Mhz, get 58K, rerun with overclock and get 62K but this time you dont close the score window, so the main window score doesnt get updated yet.

It's the same for 3D03,05,06...

I.nfraR.ed
I.nfraR.ed

Appologies accepted. I've always respected you and this accident doesn't change it.

 

I don't remember the specific case, most probably some of the other tests was very bad compared to others, so I reran it together with the usual CL. If moderators decide it's bugged, I don't really mind. Card should be good for 1080-1100MHz GPU on water.

I will retest it some time in the future.

tiborrr
tiborrr

Yes, I am aware of that hence my deepest apology to my slavic brother Infrared :)

tiborrr
tiborrr

P.S.: Looking forward to your benching. I will purchase a 3850 this week and start preparing it :)

I.nfraR.ed
I.nfraR.ed

I have a better board and cpu now, so my scores should go up easily,

however I don't know when will have time to bench all this stuff in the list - it's getting bigger and bigger while free time is getting less...

 

I have some potential #1 cards in popular categories like HD4870, HD4850, GTX280 and so on,

but really needs time, LN2 and proper tweaking. With my 20L dewar I can't even go through all benches in one session.

 

Not to mention all these s.A and s.939 CPUs for which I need to leave my job in order to test them at least once :/