moderator changed status from 'reported by user' to 'checked by a moderator'
Cpt_Wolf
reported by user due to wrong hardware match (Rage 128 Ultra not Pro model. Please look at GPU-Z screenshot and 3DMark also.)
Cpt_Wolf
reported by user (Rage 128 Ultra was used in Rage 128 Pro category. Ultra have DDR memory not SDR. Please remove that hoax.
Kind regards)
Strunkenbold
Rage 128 never had DDR memory. Only just SD or SGRAM. This were GPU-Z readout errors and I cleaned categories years ago.
Strunkenbold
moderator changed status from 'reported by user' to 'checked by a moderator' - reason: Despite GPU-Z says 64 bit, its actually 128 bit. You can check my submission where I compared GPU-Z and Everest output.
Comments
hello veld
can i ask you some info?
where you find this driver for ati rage?
6.14.10.6462?
can you link it?
Hi.
http://www.ixbt.com/news/soft/index.shtml?02/77/43 - here I guess
If not, I'll try later
thanks veld
I tried it later... i love rage card but is not easy to find good driver for these cards...
uhmmm this is a sample Catalyst 4.3v with or without Control center for Win 98/ME 2000/XP
Did you have edit the ".inf" installer file with the vendor device ID?
anyway catalyst 4.3v corrispond to 6.14.10.6430 and not 6.14.10.6462
Log in or register to comment.